Re: How do I overclock?
Both identical. How about a 3200 vs an FX-57 instead? The answer is the FX-57...by .4 frames. Yes, POINT FOUR as in 2/5ths of a SINGLE frame better!!!!!!
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...-games2_3.html
What kind of environment do you keep applying these performance increases to?
It has been clearly proven time and time again that once graphical settings are set to high, and AA and AF being used...there is little or NO performace gain at all between AMD64 3200 and an FX-57 when playing games!
Here it is again,
part1: medium settings which show CPU gain(NOBODY plays at these settings with anything less than a bottom of the line card).
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...cpu-games.html
part2: high settings, AA + AF:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...pu-games2.html
Part2 is the one that is important here. Part1 verifies what you say...but it completely and utterly useless when talking about games and actual settings that we play at. Who the hell uses an x18/x1900 or 78/7900 at those pathetic settings? Nobody of course.
Therefore it is clearly evident that if one has an AMD64 3200 or an FX-57...most games will see on average a whole TWO frames more in games when using AA and AF + high settings.
You guys can claim whatever you want...the results are posted clearly in those 2 links.
CPU speed only matters for encoding/decoding stuff...programs that rely on raw speed only. Not games by any means of the word...PERIOD.
Originally posted by lonegunm4n
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...-games2_3.html
What kind of environment do you keep applying these performance increases to?
It has been clearly proven time and time again that once graphical settings are set to high, and AA and AF being used...there is little or NO performace gain at all between AMD64 3200 and an FX-57 when playing games!
Here it is again,
part1: medium settings which show CPU gain(NOBODY plays at these settings with anything less than a bottom of the line card).
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...cpu-games.html
part2: high settings, AA + AF:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...pu-games2.html
Part2 is the one that is important here. Part1 verifies what you say...but it completely and utterly useless when talking about games and actual settings that we play at. Who the hell uses an x18/x1900 or 78/7900 at those pathetic settings? Nobody of course.
Therefore it is clearly evident that if one has an AMD64 3200 or an FX-57...most games will see on average a whole TWO frames more in games when using AA and AF + high settings.
You guys can claim whatever you want...the results are posted clearly in those 2 links.
CPU speed only matters for encoding/decoding stuff...programs that rely on raw speed only. Not games by any means of the word...PERIOD.
Comment