why are they bothering with this? the prices definitely don't need changes but the radar does!
-
-
hey, here's an idea...
rather than worry about gun prices, why doesnt Valve
1. fix the spectator menu bug
2. fix the "bad parse in client command" that drops half a server at a time
3. fix the ppl skywalking when a decal is uploaded that's been around since VAC was introduced.
4. fix the models face sideways or their back to you while shooting you
5. fix any number of bugs that have been around longer than anyone cares to remember.
or how about making an anti-cheat that actually...you know...stops cheats.
plenty of things that should come well before changing any gun prices.Comment
-
Fragalishus wrote..
if it wasn so goddamn true then ... well ....
hey, here's an idea...
rather than worry about gun prices, why doesnt Valve
1. fix the spectator menu bug
2. fix the "bad parse in client command" that drops half a server at a time
3. fix the ppl skywalking when a decal is uploaded that's been around since VAC was introduced.
4. fix the models face sideways or their back to you while shooting you
5. fix any number of bugs that have been around longer than anyone cares to remember.
or how about making an anti-cheat that actually...you know...stops cheats.
plenty of things that should come well before changing any gun prices.
... no need to bother, it`s just true, true, true.Comment
-
I wonder if Counter-Strike 2 is finished if Cliffe has all this time to work on this version, or maybe they just realise that CS2 is so far off they better update the current CS incase they lose their players.
Have to agree with the above, fix some of the bigger bugs first Cliffe. :)
How long does it take to add proper crosshairs for the AUG/SIG? Maybe an hour for someone to make them, then 5 minutes to put them in.Comment
-
yah pistols changes are good
yah m4 3300
not ak at $3000 but $2800/$2700
and add scout at $3000 cuz it wasent mentioned(scout is good in the right hands)
and make para have a beta feeling to it (fast and accurate) like the good old days when i used to skip meals to play cs :)Comment
-
This disappoints me immensely. I state again: It is just stupid that 3/4 of the guns in this game simply go unused.Comment
-
It is just stupid that 3/4 of the guns in this game simply go unused.
Well, you don't have to not use them just because they suck :P In pubs, at any rate, it can be a hell of a lot of fun to own with a "sucky" gun.Comment
-
LOL this is hilarious,i read the posts of when they came out with the money changes,people disliked it,now that they took it back,people disliked that they decided not to change the money,honestly will the devs ever get credit?Comment
-
Cmoney wrote..
the prices needs changing....and the radar also needs changing, everything needs changing, especially condition zero.
why are they bothering with this? the prices definitely don't need changes but the radar does!Comment
-
CheesyPeteza wrote..
Hah.. CS2 will be Counter-Strike based on the Half-Life 2 engine (I urge you to inform me if I'm mistaken).
I wonder if Counter-Strike 2 is finished if Cliffe has all this time to work on this version, or maybe they just realise that CS2 is so far off they better update the current CS incase they lose their players.
Cliffe = Not a Half-Life 2 Dev.
Those were good changes Cliffe, though I will agree we really do need semi-opaque radar and updated X-Hair sprites for the AUG and Sig-552 Commando.
I forget what else I was going to say..Comment
-
GeOTek wrote..
People are always quicker to criticise than praise.
LOL this is hilarious,i read the posts of when they came out with the money changes,people disliked it,now that they took it back,people disliked that they decided not to change the money,honestly will the devs ever get credit?
No-one has changed their minds; I think you'll find that the people complaining here are part of the minority that supported the changes in the other topic.Comment
-
yay an intelligent response.your exactly right.People who like it,think cool and go on,people that dont,wanna comment about it.Comment
-
i like that money idea. ill fight for it, you dont want it go fuck a duck.Comment
-
Hmm...
I'm truly worried about the changes. I've never had a problem with the weapon prices. Although I think the AK and AWP could cost a few hundred dollars more but these changes are extremely drastic. And what for? It seems like Valve is changing just cause they feel like it. And yet they leave many bugs completely unfixed that cause many problems in-game but they are trying to restructure the games economy? 5 bullet AWP? FOR WHAT REASON?!?! Why? I need an excellent reason then from whiners that don't know how to avoid an awper with proper burst strafing.
All the base weapons of: Glock/USP/Deagle/MP5/AK-47/M4A1/AUG/Sig/AWP/Galil/
Famas/Autosnipers all serve a purpose in this game. A skilled glocker can kill an AWPer as a skilled AWP can kill a skilled glocker. An AWPer can kill an autosniper. An M4A1er can kill an AK-47er. Everyone one of those guns are all completely lethal to each other and a skilled player would people to pick a gun from that list and to kill any other player with a gun from that list. Some guns are harder than others but it is quite possible.Unlike a Mac-10. Sometimes you can get a lucky quadruple headshot and sometimes you hit nothing. It's completely luck and random. I'd rather go roll dice.
I've always loved CS's formula. I never cared nor currently care for any of the other guns. I like my AK because I feel like I can kill someone with it. I like my M4 because I can kill with it. Unlike a MAC-10, A TMP, or a SIG P228 I am not able to kill people as easily. No efficient burst headshots that make you feel sexy. I'd rather have a glock because the recoil is not ridiculously random plus you can jump around with the burst fire making it very difficult for a newb awper to hit you. The "other" guns suck period. People are whining about how boring the game is but all competitive players love the game the way it is right now. Aside from all the bugs and the slow down jumping.
Originally I was against splitting the community in half with an official "Pro mode" CS but I think it is inevitable. Valve wants to dick around with CS because people are whining but the entire competitive community wants it to stay the same. I haven't played public since my first match and I never want to play public again. In my opinion it's a horrible experience and I don't see how the majority of the community plays it that way.
I think Valve should just might as well do a "Pro-mode" but I believe the "Pro-mode" should be left to the competitive community. Entrust it in the hands of developers that are active in the competitive community. As long as you inform the players what the difference between normal and pro-mode CS there won't be a huge problems. Most people won't even care. They'll be oblivious to Pro-mode and the competitive community and be happy. Valve can change the prices, make the AWP 5 bullets or whatever. And all the "Pro-Mode" players will be happy because the integral CS formula will remain unbroken.
Fix the freaking bugs for god sakes, its embarassing to see these bugs released and visible in a commercial product. I'm sick of people killing me without looking at me. Does Valve even care? Take out the shield good god.Comment
-
Well, I like the money idea too, with slight modification, so don't assume that what me and Donald D. are doing in my bedroom implies that I don't want those changes...
Anyway, Para?noid hit the nail on the head with this one, same thing I was thinking. People complain when they don't like something, but are often quiet in praise, if they even bother.Comment
Comment