HLGuard v1.20 Released

[Re-call]

Gpig20 wrote..

I'd rather have the ability to play at 100% not hindered and take the risk of having a cheater(which I can leave if there is) compared to not being able to play certain maps or do certain things before of a "helpful" tool. Of course the only map that sucks with HLguard sucks before HLguard. So really HLguard is doing me a favor. I really hate when it gets switched to awp_map...

you dont run a server, do you? o_O

[Gpig]

Just a server that is populated with bots. Otherwise I use it for 2v2's. So no.

[crap]

» mp_footsteps now defaulted to 0

[Ravenium]

Uh, you'd have to set it to 0. I still have mine to 1, since sound is important to me :)



-Rav

[wtaag]

crap wrote..

» mp_footsteps now defaulted to 0

No its not.

[Serious Sam]

That's kind of stupid getting rid of footsteps. Just kick and ban people you strongly believe are cheating.

[disabled]

valve should build a cruise missle platform in their parking lot and launch missles at the suspected hideouts of cheaters.

[mouth]

Dangki wrote..

Te sound hacks seem like the aimbot/wallhack makers are getting desperate.

Great, isn't it?

wtaag wrote..

Wow, people may actually stop bitching.

Yeah. Think that's at all related to their ability to play without an anti-cheat program screwing with the game for NON cheaters? Imagine that.



Don't get uppity. You're in the wrong fucking place if you expect people to NOT complain about things like that. Don't even act like you're irritated by people who don't like lame defects that are borderline inexcusable. You got me, punky?

disabled wrote..

valve should build a cruise missle platform in their parking lot and launch missles at the suspected hideouts of cheaters.

After that, they could build some more to launch at the houses of people who haven't figured out how old these glib draconian jokes have gotten.

[=FaW= Boba Fett]

wtaag wrote..

Wow, people may actually stop bitching.

Seriousely if you want to see bitching on HLGUARD, go here.



http://www.forumplanet.com/planetfortre...01&tid=785199

As for HLGUARD bitching wtaag is a part of the HLGUARD team, and is no doubt probably tired of all the bitching both here and on the UA Forums where people seem to have no clue how HLGUARD works, or think they KNOW how it works.



For HLGUARD screwing around non cheaters, well it doesn't happen if at ALL if the admin is, believe it or not, ACTUALLY smart enough to RTFM (Read the F'ing manual) and install HLGUARD correctly and have it configured properly.

[Willior]

have you ever noticed that whenever you go into a non-anti-cheat server there are always cheaters? always

[wtaag]

mouth wrote..

Great, isn't it?



Yeah. Think that's at all related to their ability to play without an anti-cheat program screwing with the game for NON cheaters? Imagine that.

Wallhack blocking is not a perfect science. There's not a absolute 1 way to write it. We do our best. This latest release should eliminate the flickering since most of it was rewritten. Also... Its not our faults that server admins run our program on slow servers. Wallhack blocking requires CPU usage. It has thousands of calculations to process... so the slow server will have more problems. If you go to a decent speed server with the proper setup... you should have no problems. We just make the program.... we can't hold the admins hands and install it for them along with the hundred things on their server that they may have fubar'd at some point. Get your facts straight before you go start running your mouth.

mouth wrote..

Don't get uppity. You're in the wrong fucking place if you expect people to NOT complain about things like that. Don't even act like you're irritated by people who don't like lame defects that are borderline inexcusable. You got me, punky?

Uppity??? Better open up that hooked on phonics book again read how to compose a backing to your adjective (uppity) so that it has more validity and doesn't look like a random blurt. Less of course the mailman doesn't deliver to the mobile home community. You tell me.

[Sa-Raven]

Maybe i should get this anti-Cheat program. Hum Just maybe

[mugwamp]

I said it once before, I'll say it again, Valve wasn't the only reason the PB developers gave up on cs, you guys had better swallow those compliants unless they're contructive and actually help the HLG people, Otherwise shut up and stop bitching that the wallhack block on HLG doesn't work on some server running windows 95 with 64 megs of ram on 233 celeron cpu with 60 other plugins running.

[mouth]

=FaW= Boba Fett wrote..

As for HLGUARD bitching wtaag is a part of the HLGUARD team, and is no doubt probably tired of all the bitching both here and on the UA Forums where people seem to have no clue how HLGUARD works, or think they KNOW how it works.

Yes, because again, it's just SUCH a shock to see people complain when they're affected by half-assed defects for simply wanting to play.

For HLGUARD screwing around non cheaters, well it doesn't happen if at ALL if the admin is, believe it or not, ACTUALLY smart enough to RTFM (Read the F'ing manual) and install HLGUARD correctly and have it configured properly.

Which about, what, 20% of the server admins? I personally believe that the majority of admins out there are morons. Either you do too, or you're full of it.

wtaag wrote..

Wallhack blocking is not a perfect science. There's not a absolute 1 way to write it. We do our best.

Fine. Great. Just don't act like you have disdain for people bitching about something that NEEDS to be bitched about. Guess what, jackass? Players have already suffered enough from cheaters, and shit like this makes them suffer MORE. Quite honestly, as a player myself, your work is fairly WORTHLESS if it's going to be just as much a burden as cheaters were. HL is fucked up enough without HLGuard adding more to the pile; a double-edged sword masquerading as an anti-cheat prog doesn't help shit.

This latest release should eliminate the flickering since most of it was rewritten. Also... Its not our faults that server admins run our program on slow servers. Wallhack blocking requires CPU usage. It has thousands of calculations to process... so the slow server will have more problems. If you go to a decent speed server with the proper setup... you should have no problems.

Oh, right. The "Yeah, uh, any fuckups we make are directly due to hardware. Spend more money if you expect anything we do to work" defense. Classic. Bullshit. More like "Uh...we forgot to take into account that not every server is running off a dual P4 1.5 Ghz machine". Give me a laugh and define "slow server". Somehow i doubt that these servers are all being run on P2 233s with 64 megs of RAM.

We just make the program.... we can't hold the admins hands and install it for them along with the hundred things on their server that they may have fubar'd at some point. Get your facts straight before you go start running your mouth.

It's called "Planning accordingly and not blaming everyone else". It's not been kept a secret that most admins are haphazard in maintaining their servers. The bottom line, tool, is that the players themselves get the short end of the stick with this.

Uppity??? Better open up that hooked on phonics book again read how to compose a backing to your adjective (uppity) so that it has more validity and doesn't look like a random blurt. Less of course the mailman doesn't deliver to the mobile home community. You tell me.

Works just fine as far as i'm concerned, bonzo.

[Gpig]

Hehehehe, bonzo, heheheh... sorry...