!!!GASP!!! this is an awsome model. I love the silver 1, but I would prefer a mark 23 (socom) as a usp replacement.
Get Dusted
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Edited by [user="20266"] @ [time="1069490502"]
Outstanding attention to detail. Looks in every way like a USP Tactical, down to the speed bump on the trigger and the legible German stag-horn proof house marks on the slide. I don't think the two-tone version looks fake either. I even pulled mine out to compare.
One relatively minor thing I would point out though, this model is chambered for 9mm, while the USP in the game is .45 ACP. Also, the weapon is perpetually safetied, but this is probably the fault of the reference pictures more than anything else. Super minor stuff, but great skin.The safety up is on, the safety down is to decock it.
Actually, the safety is on, and yet it isn't. This model has the safety's physical position in the fire mode. However, the white line on the safety points to the white S for "Safe" and not the red F for "Fire". Therefore, the truth is that the skinner or mesher misplaced the location of the white line, so that when it is parallel to the frame it should be pointing to the red F. This proves us both right, because the safety is on yet isn't, if you follow.
Look at this image, the upper USP in it shows it with the safety ON.
In all the models the safety is parallel to the slide, thus indicating the safety is in fact OFF.Comment
-
Edited by [user="50658"] @ [time="1069483869"]-1 for being wrong caliber and having the safety on.
The safety up is on, the safety down is to decock it.
Look at this image, the upper USP in it shows it with the safety ON.
In all the models the safety is parallel to the slide, thus indicating the safety is in fact OFF.
Over all nice model, but I want the one that has a animated shell flying out of the chamber.and bullet_head, those anims are from Jihad's guns only, i believe.
I know we have it in the submissions but theres no shield models \= other wise I'd review that in an instant...
-or rather we had it in thereComment
Comment