Rant House has posted a new article about CS 1.4's NDA. Specifically, why have it?
Certainly the NDA has no legal bounding in many states (not the entire country) for specific age-groups, but apparently people don't realize the punishment for one specific person leaking would be getting kicked out of the BETA program, not a trial.
The contract isn't binding to Valve either, so you 14 year olds should watch out -- your privacy is in question now that your age group never signed a contract that mattered.
I'm not a beta tester. So I can say this: Why even have an NDA? Why even let around 200 losers test the damn thing? That was a bad move on Valve's part. Unless of course they wanted it to be leaked. I think that was like the worst decision Valve has made besides taking over the world...He should have just claimed that this testing was "GAY" and ended the argument there. Of course, it's lose-lose for Valve. Either it has one bug that affects three people and it, "should have been tested longer!!!" Balancing that with some sort of "need for privacy" on Valve's part (which has never existed, Valve and the CS team have always hyped their releases, or at least it was always common knowledge what was in the new version before the release).
Certainly the NDA has no legal bounding in many states (not the entire country) for specific age-groups, but apparently people don't realize the punishment for one specific person leaking would be getting kicked out of the BETA program, not a trial.
The contract isn't binding to Valve either, so you 14 year olds should watch out -- your privacy is in question now that your age group never signed a contract that mattered.
Comment