rizzuh wrote..Hi.
(identity confirmed to us through a scanned business card)
To say that he uploaded picture proof to somethingawful is probably the one forum where photo proof is the least reliabe. Of course in the thread it turns out he didn't blur the card enough so that they could actually tell who it was but you didn't present your case properly. To merely say, "Someone on a photoshopping forum uploaded the business card of someone who works at VALVe to prove that the employee told them that 1.6 is coming out in two weeks." doesn't sound right unless you were to provide proof. In the thread it was proven because of the fact that they actually got all the real information out of it. If it had been blurred completely the first time through then it easily could have been bs. Like I said, you can't simply say he provided a business card as evidence. You need to explain why the evidence is valid.
Comment