Re: Your Reaction/Opinion of MW2 Post-Full Trailer
Quoting some of my worries if they balance it Treyarch style. I was perfectly happy with CoD 4's balancing actually, the spawn points needed tweaking to remove the spawn killing, but overall it was fine.
I will say again, if the machine guns will only have 50 bullet mags, then they should not even be in the game. It removes the whole purpose.
Now, you might say that having 100 bullet mags will lead to spamming. However, spamming is what a machine gun is meant for (albeit not through walls at random), and if you do spam, your fire will not be very accurate.
Without a grip, your first two shots will be accurate, all after that will be quite spontaneous.
With a grip, perhaps up to your first five shots will be accurate, but you will lose any benefit you once had from a Tier 1 perk.
This is exactly what CoD 4 did, and it did it perfectly. WAW destroyed this.
A machine gun with a 100 bullet mag is not a super gun. If you want to hit anything, you will have to burst fire it, if you don't want people to cross the road, you lay down a large volume.
If you aren't even going to have magazine values and other qualities reflective of real life in the slightest, why even bother making the game with a present day theme?
As I have said before, since we all seem to want this game to be extremely balanced, why don't IW just remove every weapon apart from the M16? There, thats a fair fight, now the other guy can see the same distance as you and you both have a three round burst.
Dimwit, your explanation on Rio is fair enough. It seems a little odd that US forces are in Rio (US and British forces in Russia were quite believable due to the remote areas they fought in), but I guess we'll have to wait and play through the game.
Originally posted by KC-10
I will say again, if the machine guns will only have 50 bullet mags, then they should not even be in the game. It removes the whole purpose.
Now, you might say that having 100 bullet mags will lead to spamming. However, spamming is what a machine gun is meant for (albeit not through walls at random), and if you do spam, your fire will not be very accurate.
Without a grip, your first two shots will be accurate, all after that will be quite spontaneous.
With a grip, perhaps up to your first five shots will be accurate, but you will lose any benefit you once had from a Tier 1 perk.
This is exactly what CoD 4 did, and it did it perfectly. WAW destroyed this.
A machine gun with a 100 bullet mag is not a super gun. If you want to hit anything, you will have to burst fire it, if you don't want people to cross the road, you lay down a large volume.
If you aren't even going to have magazine values and other qualities reflective of real life in the slightest, why even bother making the game with a present day theme?
As I have said before, since we all seem to want this game to be extremely balanced, why don't IW just remove every weapon apart from the M16? There, thats a fair fight, now the other guy can see the same distance as you and you both have a three round burst.
Dimwit, your explanation on Rio is fair enough. It seems a little odd that US forces are in Rio (US and British forces in Russia were quite believable due to the remote areas they fought in), but I guess we'll have to wait and play through the game.
Comment