Battlefield 2 v1.50 Patch Update - 1/13/09
Collapse
X
-
Re: Battlefield 2 v1.50 Patch Update - 1/13/09
what they meant to say was that beta patch will come before christmas of 2009. there was a slight miss information at the weekly meetingComment
-
Re: Battlefield 2 v1.50 Patch Update - 1/13/09
If you read through that you'll see a DICE guy hinting that 1.5 will have better hit registration.Comment
-
Re: Battlefield 2 v1.50 Patch Update - 1/13/09
That's interesting. Nice find.Originally posted by LaikaSBhttp://forums.electronicarts.co.uk/b...975-legal.html
If you read through that you'll see a DICE guy hinting that 1.5 will have better hit registration.Comment
-
-
Re: Battlefield 2 v1.50 Patch Update - 1/13/09
Rep+ for you sir :)Originally posted by LaikaSBhttp://forums.electronicarts.co.uk/b...975-legal.html
If you read through that you'll see a DICE guy hinting that 1.5 will have better hit registration.Comment
-
Re: Battlefield 2 v1.50 Patch Update - 1/13/09
You know, that in and of itself could fix the J-10 issue, actually. I think part of the J-10 problem, aside from having a miniscule hitbox, is hitreg. My hitreg alone has dramatically improved in both this and BF2142 since getting FiOS ( :yay: ) so certainly there is some hitreg issues that can be dealt with client-side, but the missing missiles (for some reason I just love saying that) are a server-side/game engine thing. In single player I was able to nail J-10s that were in a full turn perpendicular to me where I barely had a lock on it - they sucked up missiles just like the F35B, but online we all know that to not be the case.
Perhaps this patch will balance the J-10/F35B after all. :)Comment
-
Re: Battlefield 2 v1.50 Patch Update - 1/13/09
The unresolved/unexpected features update should be quite substantial for the 1.5 "upgrade" as it has to "enhance" a number of internal "features" which have been repeatedly compromised.
I'm not sure about upping a rep for a non-statement made by another. That's could only be hearsay at best -- but NOTHING was really said. So, it's simply speculatory information. If you have to "read into" something to make sense, you're creating a fictional reality. Why don't we just see what happens instead?Comment
-
Re: Battlefield 2 v1.50 Patch Update - 1/13/09
We've been waiting to see since June 23, 2008.The unresolved/unexpected features update should be quite substantial for the 1.5 "upgrade" as it has to "enhance" a number of internal "features" which have been repeatedly compromised.
I'm not sure about upping a rep for a non-statement made by another. That's could only be hearsay at best -- but NOTHING was really said. So, it's simply speculatory information. If you have to "read into" something to make sense, you're creating a fictional reality. Why don't we just see what happens instead?Comment
-
Re: Battlefield 2 v1.50 Patch Update - 1/13/09
Are you ****ing kidding me the hit indicator is client-side?Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Battlefield 2 v1.50 Patch Update - 1/13/09
Anyone know if they'll implement "full" wide screen support? Not just stretching the screen.Comment
-
Re: Battlefield 2 v1.50 Patch Update - 1/13/09
I think they should let everyone play AF/EF,
Open it UP,
I paid for it and I havnt even seen as server for either!
Boosters have already paid for themselves.
Misses the Great Wall, and other no where to be found maps!Comment

Comment