Gunner is more powerful than Pilot in vanilla BF2. Because of having played ghost town too much.I found it hard too adapt to the vanilla choppers..I found myself running out of missiles in critical times. I usually fly at high speed at attacking targets.It has been my style to fire more than required missiles to destroy armor as when a chopper is flying at high speed.At speed,chances of missiles hitting are less.Thus with chopper only having 8 missiles .It definitely reduces the performance of a chopper to take down armor significantly. Apache Longbow is so much powerful than all the vanilla chopper. Yes I think it is more powerful than MI28 too.
My perspective?
Gunner is more powerful than Pilot in Vanilla BF2.
Heck Vanilla Chopper is total crap without gunners. With 8 missiles it is so hard to take out a chopper now. So the importance of TV missiles has increased. When I play Chopper with my pal. Most of the time it is my(the gunner's) job to destroy the opponent chopper not the pilot. I don't know how about other people. It is something like a whopping 5:1 Kill Gunner to Pilot kill ratio in chopper vs chopper engagement.
Pilot is more powerful than gunner in Special Forces
In fact,I prefer to fly Apache on my own rather than with a gunner.The gunner is almost useless in my opinion.As the pilot's crosshair is above the gunner's minigun or tv,pilots will normally take up all the kills before a gunner does. No matter how hard I try to spray bullets at the person manning the AA upfront, pilots will always get the kill first.To line up shots for the gunner, a pilot has to hover around and fly slow but that makes the chopper more vulnurable.
An effective Apache is an Apache that flies fast.An Apache that flies fast makes a gunner useless.
A gunner in HIND might be more useful than in Apache but it is because HIND is just crap. The missiles fires out of target.
A gunner is powerful in BF2 but useless in SF. What do you think? I would like to see some kind of "standardised" function. Equal capabilities of pilot and gunner in both BF2 and SF. I would expect BF2 and SF have the same amount of missiles. Elevate the TV missiles view of the SF choppers and the minigun crosshair.Buff up the Hind or change it with Mi28.
My perspective?
Gunner is more powerful than Pilot in Vanilla BF2.
Heck Vanilla Chopper is total crap without gunners. With 8 missiles it is so hard to take out a chopper now. So the importance of TV missiles has increased. When I play Chopper with my pal. Most of the time it is my(the gunner's) job to destroy the opponent chopper not the pilot. I don't know how about other people. It is something like a whopping 5:1 Kill Gunner to Pilot kill ratio in chopper vs chopper engagement.
Pilot is more powerful than gunner in Special Forces
In fact,I prefer to fly Apache on my own rather than with a gunner.The gunner is almost useless in my opinion.As the pilot's crosshair is above the gunner's minigun or tv,pilots will normally take up all the kills before a gunner does. No matter how hard I try to spray bullets at the person manning the AA upfront, pilots will always get the kill first.To line up shots for the gunner, a pilot has to hover around and fly slow but that makes the chopper more vulnurable.
An effective Apache is an Apache that flies fast.An Apache that flies fast makes a gunner useless.
A gunner in HIND might be more useful than in Apache but it is because HIND is just crap. The missiles fires out of target.
A gunner is powerful in BF2 but useless in SF. What do you think? I would like to see some kind of "standardised" function. Equal capabilities of pilot and gunner in both BF2 and SF. I would expect BF2 and SF have the same amount of missiles. Elevate the TV missiles view of the SF choppers and the minigun crosshair.Buff up the Hind or change it with Mi28.
Comment