Incorrect use of the term LAG

[Sir. Shpox]

Re: Incorrect use of the term LAG

Or it makes you sound less like a moron.

[Jesse]

Re: Incorrect use of the term LAG

Our server never lags, ever, period. Why doesn't it lag? It has resources/power to burn. Way more than you need for BF2 or SF. It only uses 3% of its 100mbit pipe. Hmm love to have that net connection at home :p It has never exceeded 80% CPU resources. This includes running VOIP an Battle Recorder. Now EA recommends not to run BR on 64 player maps because it takes a massive amount of grunt, yet our dedicated box, which we don't share with anyone, unlike 99% of BF2 servers which have more than 1 instance of BF2 playing at the same time. Without BR running it uses less than 30% CPU.

So you made this thread to drop your server a plug? And also, your server lags. If you say it doesn't, either you're a liar, or you have a quantum computer from the year 2350 when circuit chips using quantum entanglement finally become afordable.

[vbl]

Re: Incorrect use of the term LAG

LAG as I said was a slang term "orginally" to describe network latency. Gamers are the ones who have adopted the term to mean more than this and often refer to lack of PC resources to be LAG but its technically incorrect.

The point more so was referring to inadequate PC resources. Or your PC is a piece of outdated crap that either needs to be replaced or upgraded and for people to understand what is required to play large maps.

Your server could be tip-top and users could still experience network lag at any point between their machine and yours.

[PBAsydney]

Re: Incorrect use of the term LAG

i guess ur video ram must be 256MB?

Nope, the X300 comes in 64 and 128 only i think, got 128.