Im making the move back to CSS and ghost recon, just killing time tell ghost recon advanced warfighter for PC.
Only thing i dont like is the follage, its so low polly, many sims have this. I like lots of tall grass. Also the characters just look off, i dont know why they just look funny.
the only good thing in armed assault is the large battleground with clear terrain where people can go into a masscre (like some of the maps in BF42: DC). But compare the graphics to BF2, BF2 is 10x better than AA:AA.
Im sorry guys but that game looks like crap! Look at the ground textures, they look like Quake 1. As for the models, the lighting is horrible, the soldiers look detailed but they look software raytraced. I really can't see anything of value here.
Im sorry guys but that game looks like crap! Look at the ground textures, they look like Quake 1. As for the models, the lighting is horrible, the soldiers look detailed but they look software raytraced. I really can't see anything of value here.
Pretty much like JointOps. The gameplay was pretty good, but the graphics weren't that great.
Sorry I didnt clarify this up. It's confusing because the two games are both AA's. But Americas army is generally called AA, and Armed Assualt is called ArmA
I'm going to play Americas Army
I'm waiting for Armed Assualt
True, the graphics are pretty bad compared to BF2, but the gamplay is just undescribable how good it is in Operation flashpoint (even better in Armed Assualt). The community will be making some high poly stuff for the game, so it should really improve the looks.
Originally posted by [i]_Bleed_to_Death
I dont care much what game you play, but, are you coming back to RnR?! You must!
Comment