Re: Armed Assault News
Basically, the gameplay as a whole. How interactive everything is. Tanks run over trees, fences, etc. Buildings are destrtuctable. Firefights can be over huge distances or small within an urban city. Tanks engage targets from hunreds of meters away, as well as planes and helicopters. Maps are so big you don't need to worry really about going off of it with a plane, so they are more realsitic speeds. Weapons systems are more realsitic. Transport vehicles are actually needed. Blah blah bal. I can go on forever.
This screen kinda shows the engagment distances.

If you are that much of a guy for graphics over gameplay then this isn't for you. (No offense or anything) I am just saying that. I strongly perfer the gameplay of this over its graphics. Maybe you also don't like realism and such? At any rate, I pretty much KNOW I'm getting it.
Originally posted by CyberDuck
This screen kinda shows the engagment distances.

If you are that much of a guy for graphics over gameplay then this isn't for you. (No offense or anything) I am just saying that. I strongly perfer the gameplay of this over its graphics. Maybe you also don't like realism and such? At any rate, I pretty much KNOW I'm getting it.
Crysis looks fan-freakin-tastic, but i wouldnt hold your breath waiting for it to be the next awesome online experience... :cry:
Comment