We were hacked. Several times over the past two weeks, in fact.
While all passwords are encrypted and salted, it's recommended that you change your password here when you can.
"Wow dude, you bitch about everything dont you? Try.. uhm... Not sucking? The RPG is way cool. It takes way more skill and precision to use which seperates the good rpgers vs the ****ty ones (as yourself). So please, stop bitching and just quit BF2 all together. Thanks."
considering they oppose most of the civilized world i think they are "bad guys".
Actually, it would seem USMC is the "bad" guys since they are the ones who invaded China and the Middle East for a radio station (Sharqi), oil fields (Daqing, Zatar), airfield (Gulf of Oman), power source (Dragon Valley, Kubra Dam, Dalian Plant), dock (Karkand), and mineral resource (Fushe Pass).
Originally posted by meatwad
The Eryx and SRAW are the most gayest Shoulder launched anti-tank weaponry ive ever seen on earth. the sad thing is their both real. it shows an utter lack of enginuity.considering the SRAW and F22 raptors are the only "new" equipment in bf2 vanilla i think they should just replace em with the AT4 and f16.
SRAW and Eryx lacking ingenuity? I would think these weapons are far more innovative than an AT weapon with a method that has been used since WWII. I am damn glad these weapons are real, at least the U.S. infantry has better fighting chance against armors by guiding AT rounds than having to aim, calculate the path of projectile, and time the launch of the projectile. In terms of the franchise, the AT weapons took a big turn from bazookas, panzershrecks, and LAW. RPG-7 on the other had, was already debutted in the BF franchise in BF:Vietnam. Also, there is no F/A-22 in this game, what you are referring to is the F-35 JSF.
I love the RPG. A little practice with estimation and you're set. An rpg round goes faster than the SRAW or ERYX rounds. Plus, because it is not guided, you can shoot and duck away to cover. You also get more ammo. 6 rockets instead of 5. It also has a somewhat larger blast radius compared to the SRAW or ERYX. So me wubs the RPG.
EDIT: The comment about the RPG being weak is not true. The RPG projectile is the same strength as the ERYX and SRAW.
yeah but it takes all 6 rockets to destroy a tank. sometimes after all 6 it won't even be destroyed. this is shooting at the treads.
Back in old BF1942 with some practice the RPGs were, in SF they are great as well, I wish they were and Unlock for the AT class for vanilla bf2. Its nice to run out shoot and retreat without having to stare down an APC or Tank to guide you missle. I like um,...
i love the rpg because it is way better than the bazooka from bf42. i was real good with the bazooka, and now i am great with the rpg. i was playing warlord last night and i sniped a guy from forever away with the rpg. the guy must have not seen it coming cuz it was in the air for a long time. you are also quiker with it
Actually, it would seem USMC is the "bad" guys since they are the ones who invaded China and the Middle East for a radio station (Sharqi), oil fields (Daqing, Zatar), airfield (Gulf of Oman), power source (Dragon Valley, Kubra Dam, Dalian Plant), dock (Karkand), and mineral resource (Fushe Pass).
SRAW and Eryx lacking ingenuity? I would think these weapons are far more innovative than an AT weapon with a method that has been used since WWII. I am damn glad these weapons are real, at least the U.S. infantry has better fighting chance against armors by guiding AT rounds than having to aim, calculate the path of projectile, and time the launch of the projectile. In terms of the franchise, the AT weapons took a big turn from bazookas, panzershrecks, and LAW. RPG-7 on the other had, was already debutted in the BF franchise in BF:Vietnam. Also, there is no F/A-22 in this game, what you are referring to is the F-35 JSF.
I dont get it, why do people think the RPG-7 suck?
It doesent even beep in a tank with it, you just lose half of your armor. You dont have to use the scope either since you have a crosshair.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment