Since i won't be playing BF2SF untilchristmas (wife bought for present), i wanna know how the SCAR-H stacks up against the F2000. My assumptions are, the SCAR-H will do more damage (7.62 round vs. 5.56 round), a bit more accurate, but of course no GL.So, how is the SCAR-H really in game, and what are the stats of the SCAR-H.
-
-
Re: SCAR-H vs. F2000
SCAR-H by a long shot. Good scope, great accuracy on single shot, and wonderful power ala the G3 or so. I love it compared to the FN2000, but alas, you can't unlock the -H in regular BF2. -
Re: SCAR-H vs. F2000
THe SCAR-H has a scope, are you sure that's not only on the -L (it sounds noobish, but i've never played, or seen this game, what do you expect, so don't flame me). Also, does it have a 20 round mag like in RL. And can somebody get the stats on this gun?Originally posted by ||ass||variableComment
-
Re: SCAR-H vs. F2000
F2000 has that damned Grenade Launcher that gets me every freaking time! It even fires at close range (IE 3 feet) and does little or no damage to the user!
But, I do believe there is 2 SCAR's, 1 5.56, 1 7.62? I dunno, but the SCAR is pretty good. I prefer the Assault one (7.62) compared to the SF one (5.56).Comment
-
Re: SCAR-H vs. F2000
The SCAR-H is the 7.62 assault weapon, the SCAR-L is the 5.56 spec ops weapon. EA didn't clarify, but i'm a expert at computers and guns, so i know.Originally posted by OwnthinkComment
-
Re: SCAR-H vs. F2000
Good. I'm gonna go try to acquire some pot.Originally posted by Eddy01741Comment
-
Re: SCAR-H vs. F2000
Huh, hwat do you mean???Originally posted by Ownthink
Comment
-
Re: SCAR-H vs. F2000
Red dot scope and 30 round clip. I'm positive it's the SCAR-H.Originally posted by Eddy01741Comment
-
Re: SCAR-H vs. F2000
Not so sure about that. The F2000 is my favorite gun thus far. I can snipe with it and it it freaking kicks ass up close and personal. I am constantly getting killed with the damn thing also.Comment
-
Re: SCAR-H vs. F2000
Well, I saw your sig, so I decided to **** you off and say that. Obviously didn't work though.Originally posted by Eddy01741Huh, hwat do you mean??? Comment
-
Re: SCAR-H vs. F2000
I personaly hate the f2000, I hate the scope, and I hate the noobs who use the nade launchers from a foot away (Don't real M203's have to be shot so far to arm and detonate? They should really add something like that in BF2 and BF2:SF) Anyways, the SCAR-H is way better.Comment
-
Re: SCAR-H vs. F2000
AWESOME (can't wait till Xmas), it has the scope of a spec ops gun, the power of the G3, AND a 30 round clip the G3 shoulda had in game (even thoughnot in RL, but the SCAR-H has only a 20 round mag in rl too), as well, it gives versatility of nades (nades>gl imo, nades can clear rooftops, into alleyways when waiting for a enemy to come through etc.)Originally posted by ||ass||variableComment
-
Re: SCAR-H vs. F2000
:laugh:Originally posted by OwnthinkComment
-
Re: SCAR-H vs. F2000
I really doubt they bother with arming devices in RL(I'm sure there's some fanatics here that can tell us). And yes, something like that in the game would have been good for gaming purposes i.e. making Karkand into an amazing map instead of just umm...very good.Originally posted by S Chow
Why does everyone talk about SCAR-H(sounds awesome though)? SF has the -L version for spec ops...
Comment
-
Re: SCAR-H vs. F2000
Um, just to be annoying, the M203 arms at about 30 ft (after a number of revolutions, it's rifled). Also, if it exploded within 30 feet, it could injure the user himself.Originally posted by rtgbs7kI really doubt they bother with arming devices in RL(I'm sure there's some fanatics here that can tell us). And yes, something like that in the game would have been good for gaming purposes i.e. making Karkand into an amazing map instead of just umm...very good.
Why does everyone talk about SCAR-H(sounds awesome though)? SF has the -L version for spec ops...Comment
Comment