Read this load of crap from this BF2 stat site

[IndianScout]

Re: Read this load of crap from this BF2 stat site

padding ie.. knife/revive is in the ROE,

unfortunetly there is no written rule about blackhawk whoring,

even tho most of us consider it padding..

[IndianScout]

Re: Read this load of crap from this BF2 stat site

padding ie.. knife/revive is in the ROE,

unfortunetly there is no written rule about blackhawk whoring,

even tho most of us consider it padding..

[gungho]

Re: Read this load of crap from this BF2 stat site

This is probably going to ruffle a few feathers, and is admittedly a controvertial thing to say but I feel it needs debating:

About Blackhawk whoring, surely Blackhawk whoring is only possible if the enemy team doesn't work together to keep the blackhawk out of operation??? Therefore if someone is Blackhawk whoring then they deserve the points they get... you don't like it? Then sort it and keep the flippin' things out of the sky? Much better solution than complaining about it?

Feel free to argue or discuss lol

It gives an unfair advantage to the US team. The enemy have to devout time & effort to keep the blackhawk down, rather than getting points/kills. The US team dont have to make the same effort against their enemy, and so can score better.

[gungho]

Re: Read this load of crap from this BF2 stat site

This is probably going to ruffle a few feathers, and is admittedly a controvertial thing to say but I feel it needs debating:

About Blackhawk whoring, surely Blackhawk whoring is only possible if the enemy team doesn't work together to keep the blackhawk out of operation??? Therefore if someone is Blackhawk whoring then they deserve the points they get... you don't like it? Then sort it and keep the flippin' things out of the sky? Much better solution than complaining about it?

Feel free to argue or discuss lol

It gives an unfair advantage to the US team. The enemy have to devout time & effort to keep the blackhawk down, rather than getting points/kills. The US team dont have to make the same effort against their enemy, and so can score better.

[imported_Soda]

Re: Read this load of crap from this BF2 stat site

My best was 133 on Sharqi Peninsula. Pure infantry, didn't use a vehicle at all. And it was the standard EA US server.

[imported_Soda]

Re: Read this load of crap from this BF2 stat site

My best was 133 on Sharqi Peninsula. Pure infantry, didn't use a vehicle at all. And it was the standard EA US server.

[-Recon-(Scope)]

Re: Read this load of crap from this BF2 stat site

I got 219 on Sharqi Peninsula...64 player map with like 20 players...
the round lasted like 3hours until we all had about 100 kills and deaths each
wow that was a boring game...I think we barely even saw each other on the map, except for the vehicles you see speeding to every flag

[-Recon-(Scope)]

Re: Read this load of crap from this BF2 stat site

I got 219 on Sharqi Peninsula...64 player map with like 20 players...
the round lasted like 3hours until we all had about 100 kills and deaths each
wow that was a boring game...I think we barely even saw each other on the map, except for the vehicles you see speeding to every flag

[murt]

Re: Read this load of crap from this BF2 stat site

stats n padding n all that - who cares?

s'just numbers.

My guess - all those bothered about stats are american or americanised. (I'm taking your sports, that seem to require an obsession with statistics to make them at all interesting - as a litmus test)

Are you playing a game or seeing who can pee the highest?

If you talk about games you've played, do you talk about incidents or numbers?

regds, murt.

[murt]

Re: Read this load of crap from this BF2 stat site

stats n padding n all that - who cares?

s'just numbers.

My guess - all those bothered about stats are american or americanised. (I'm taking your sports, that seem to require an obsession with statistics to make them at all interesting - as a litmus test)

Are you playing a game or seeing who can pee the highest?

If you talk about games you've played, do you talk about incidents or numbers?

regds, murt.

[Cheeze]

Re: Read this load of crap from this BF2 stat site

I don't think 300 necesarily means they are whoring or cheating, I've seen a few scores over this, my personal top score is something like 220, and that was a one off, next highest for me is about 130. I wasn't whoring or cheating. Sometimes you just have those rounds where you are on fire. There's plenty of times I struggle to get beyond 30 or 40 points lol. BTW, every round on Mashtuur where I've seen the MEC side have a few players concentrate on keeping the BH down, or capturing that spawn, the MEC have won that round. End of the day it's about teamwork. 6 guys in a BH, whoring away on Mashtuur and racking up the points are working as a team, especially now they have to leave the chopper to assist the capture. The solution is for MEC to counter this teamwork and cut off their resources. IMHO this is what makes BF2 so great, each map has to be approached with a particular strategy depending on which side you are on in order to win. Just running round shooting like in games like Call of Duty just isn't going to be enough. For every unfair advantage each team has on certain maps there is a solution, the key is communication, often with people you've never played alongside before.

[Cheeze]

Re: Read this load of crap from this BF2 stat site

I don't think 300 necesarily means they are whoring or cheating, I've seen a few scores over this, my personal top score is something like 220, and that was a one off, next highest for me is about 130. I wasn't whoring or cheating. Sometimes you just have those rounds where you are on fire. There's plenty of times I struggle to get beyond 30 or 40 points lol. BTW, every round on Mashtuur where I've seen the MEC side have a few players concentrate on keeping the BH down, or capturing that spawn, the MEC have won that round. End of the day it's about teamwork. 6 guys in a BH, whoring away on Mashtuur and racking up the points are working as a team, especially now they have to leave the chopper to assist the capture. The solution is for MEC to counter this teamwork and cut off their resources. IMHO this is what makes BF2 so great, each map has to be approached with a particular strategy depending on which side you are on in order to win. Just running round shooting like in games like Call of Duty just isn't going to be enough. For every unfair advantage each team has on certain maps there is a solution, the key is communication, often with people you've never played alongside before.

[a1pointguard]

Re: Read this load of crap from this BF2 stat site

Around 150-200 is a legit score. Maybe around 250. But 275-300... they were exploiting something. They should ban everyone with that type of BRS from using their signatures. You reap what you sow. :laugh: (Had to put a good quote in there).

[a1pointguard]

Re: Read this load of crap from this BF2 stat site

Around 150-200 is a legit score. Maybe around 250. But 275-300... they were exploiting something. They should ban everyone with that type of BRS from using their signatures. You reap what you sow. :laugh: (Had to put a good quote in there).

[shadow_wolf]

Re: Read this load of crap from this BF2 stat site

171 fully infantry, no tank whoring on a full karkand 64. Used Anti-Tank, Assault and Medic (MEC medic gun > *).

Anyone with a 300+ round score is exploiting the game system in some way. It may not be "stat padding" but you don't get 300 or more in a normal server. 300 in a round is probably lame flag jumping hawks on songhua or kubra

not always. I got 279 on sharqi after thr x2 for being commander. It was a really long round, it lasted well over an hour...bases just jept going back and fourth...I was kinda glad when it ended...but kinda ****ed when I noticed that the stats failed to record it...of all times to not work, it does it with my best score