If they brought back Wake why not...?

[imported_Ares]

Re: If they brought back Wake why not...?

well... it is a nice map and I loved it for BF1942. but The maps is very large. and a massive distance from flag to flag. BF2 is alot more action then BF1942 and I think wake was one of the most filled map in 42, and there fore it went along well.

[Jedi_Joe]

Re: If they brought back Wake why not...?

why cany they bring back Gazala, now that was a ****ing good map

[JeFFLe323]

Re: If they brought back Wake why not...?

I hated El Alemien. It was so freakin big and was just an armor map. Wasn't that fun at all.

Wake can be anything you want it to be. Infantry, armor, chopper, plane, snipers. Doesn't matter. Whatever you feel like.

Wake really isnt that good... if anything its pretty annoying:evil:

[Tk-421]

Re: If they brought back Wake why not...?

Why not bring back El Alamein? That was one of the most popular maps ever.

Wake Island was originally the demo map w/ BF1942. This leads me to a thought. The 1st is that DICE/EA haven't really given up any more BF1942 IP by releasing this map since it was in the first demo. This also allows them to keep thier "brand image" intact & look like a hero for releasing "extra" content.

I think they'll sell El Al map in a forth-coming "map pack".

[HighPlainsFister]

Re: If they brought back Wake why not...?

why cany they bring back Gazala, now that was a ****ing good map

I agree mate.Gazala was the best map in DC along with Urban siege.El Al was awsome as well but you had little or none cover when moving from outpost to outpost.A pilots dream though.

[tehpwnerofnoobs]

Re: If they brought back Wake why not...?

I hated Al. Just never got into it. Midway tho, pwnage. Even tho I got shot down every 3 seconds, it rocked. Don't think I'd like it for BF2 tho cuz I hate BF2 flying

[hightow]

Re: If they brought back Wake why not...?

Why not bring back El Alamein? That was one of the most popular maps ever.

US against what army? El Alamein is located in Africa, so it wouldn't fit into the "plot". But El Alamein was one of my favorite maps, particularly in DC.

[TexRoadkill]

Re: If they brought back Wake why not...?

It's in Egypt so it would fit a MEC scenario. That would be much more realistic then the Chineese at Wake Island.

[scott123]

Re: If they brought back Wake why not...?

Ann Landers sucks, and so does Wake island :evil:

[Possums]

Re: If they brought back Wake why not...?

Wake Island usually comes down to one thing.

One team is going to be running into another's bullets over and over.

There's not much you can really do with it.

I'd love to see some of the other BF1942 maps ported over and made RANKED.

****, if they ported over all the maps from DC and BF1942 and labeled it BF2 Special Forces, I would buy it. =S

[Blackangel]

Re: If they brought back Wake why not...?

nah, they just can't keep remaking the WWII locations, they should get off their *** and make some new maps with fresh content.

exactly! why in the hell would i want to play a map i have already played? If i wanted to play wake island, i would pop in bf1942! Get off your lazy asses and make a new map!

[MrBenis]

Re: If they brought back Wake why not...?

i hated wake the first time, and i loathe it now with the same intensity. point in case: as stated above they shouldnt only be remaking old maps. why dont they instead make maps of REAL places, as opposed to vague interpretations of locations the mappers have never visited. whats better, fighting (again) in al alamein, or fighting through the streets of NY or hong kong or even sydney. hell, i dont see why it has to be maps where its the US as an invading force. thats like suggesting the chinese/mec are too retarded to launch a counter attack, and IF you have opinions otherwise, in BF2 America is doing exactly what nazi Germany did. Eventually, the US will run out of soldiers and it comes chinas turn to fight on US soil, it will come the MEC's turn to smash the US from their lands and start attacking its allies. im not anti-us or anything, what i am is calling for variation in maps, thats all.

[Vasquez]

Re: If they brought back Wake why not...?

If they want to do new content that fits in with their "plot", they could do stuff like:

Baghdad/Basra
Tinnamen(sp?) Square
Shanghai

....

[imported_Lunatic]

Re: If they brought back Wake why not...?

Most of the Desert Combat maps rocked :) I'd still play it except not many play it these days, and I like to play on full 64 player servers. I think the large maps in BF2 could be good if they didn't have so many capture points. Makes it hard to get into some good battles.

[JoeJJohnsonII]

Re: If they brought back Wake why not...?

Seriously though it would be fun to play a first person shooter in an unorthodox setting that can't be found in any typical fps on the market.

I loved the Wal mart map for CS. I thought it sucked playablility wise (way too consticted movement in the building), but I loved the way they presented it. It was like walking through an actual wal-mart, complete with different clothing departments and garden section.

I think the greatest part about having a disneyland map would be being able to climb to the top of mattahorn Mountain (or however you spell it) and sniping. You can see the entire park from on top that thing.

If you look through a lot of DL sites, there are remakes of the 42's maps. I got an iwo jima map, omaha beach, and berlin remake. The only good one was the iwo jima map because the guy really didnt change a whole lot on the map. The berlin one looks like crap and is way too small for 64 players. If you want a GL fest, try that map with 64 people. Just shoot it off in the distance as soon as you spawn, gaurenteed to get at least two kills.