Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

[imported_Gergnoodle]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

hmmmmmmm if i was the us side it would be just alittle bit suspiscious to see flags dissapear behind me

i dont know anyone that doesn't turn on the other views to see if anyone isaround i know i do if im not in the gunner seats

so all in all it is stat padding i had a commander working with the enemy special forces to blow up his arty and such then he would repair so he could get badges
i did what any soldier would do in that situation i mounted the m1 and killed em all commander included than voted him out

i like points yes but i like winning the game even more

[Pentagon_Man]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

You get laid, I'm a computer geek and I have not got laid for seven years, how do you do it?

Well get $50 and well you know. Not to taint any 10yo's here. If it were important to you it would happen. Seven years ouch! Sorry dude

Yes collusion is exploitative, this is just a differant version of the Knive/Medic exploit except that they ain't makeing someones day vary crappy. Get screen shot and report them, though the next patch will change that.

[MackTheKnifeAU]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

Your playing mashtuur 32\64. That's the first problem.

[Yezo]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

I dont think this is stat padding. I think its more of super whoring. You need to realize that a BH and Z10, and Mi (transport, not the jet), were NEVER meant to be AA Helicopters. To use them otherwise is just plain stupid.

So in essense DICE/EA intended the choppers not to be used as AA vehicle, in essense the reason they arent firing at eachother, and the soul reason they follow eachother.

Which ultimately leads to the conclusion that: Its extreme whoring, but not padding.

If it was padding you'd see a LIMIT on the number of FLAGS you can CAP in a GAME. Which is not obviously going to happen.

[puglous]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

Yes, its exploitive. It doesn't help the team when any flag you take will get taken by the enemy a second later.

[FLYWAYchat]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

This is miles away from the goal of this game.
They don't know whats teamwork... they r only having fun.... and stat padding.

[Moke]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

Statpadding or not... ??

Report them and let EA decide

[Solid Knight]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

How would you stop people from working together on opposing sides? You can't.

[Attila]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

Well whatever, won't work nearly as well in a few days anyway.

[Harmor]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

Well whatever, won't work nearly as well in a few days anyway.

The change with the passengers not counting when capping a flag will only stop this for people who don't upgrade to the v1.03 patch.

You can still find servers that are running v1.00 now btw.

[Attila]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

The change with the passengers not counting when capping a flag will only stop this for people who don't upgrade to the v1.03 patch.

You can still find servers that are running v1.00 now btw.

Yeah but... who gives a f*** what they do on unpatched servers?

[glasseye]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

why doesnt gamespy/ea/your mama just make current patch mandatory for ranked servers?

oh i know, that would make sense.

[A_Dirty_Hippie]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

why doesnt gamespy/ea/your mama just make current patch mandatory for ranked servers?

oh i know, that would make sense.

I thought it was mandatory. If not then it should be for this patch. I cant see them allowing unpatched servers into the rankings when they have clearly made changes to the points system.(weather the BH, medic exploit, or tk)
That would kinda defeat the whole purpose for patching those things.:hmm:

[DLWebmaestro96]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

why doesnt gamespy/ea/your mama just make current patch mandatory for ranked servers?

oh i know, that would make sense.

Agreed.

[soraflair]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

You get laid, I'm a computer geek and I have not got laid for seven years, how do you do it?

...
What the hell?
On topic:
Don't worry this will be adressed in the patch.