Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

[Harmor]

Ok I think this is against EA/DICE's policy on gameplay, but I'm not sure so please enlighten me.

Two sqauads of the same clan on Mastuur. One person in each squad is the commander of each team flying in the helicopter.

First squad on the USMC team takes a Blackhawk.
Second squad on the MEC team takes a Mi-17.

They follow each other and TAKE THE SAME flag in order.

Now you're thinking they probably weren't working together and all, but when you see one of them hover and WAIT for the other to cap a flag, then cap the same flag WITHOUT shooting each other, then you know there are working together.

These two squads got over 200 points EACH since there is no cap on the number of points you can get from capping flags.


Is collusion exploitative? Is this against EA/DICE's EULA or something?

[Attila]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

It's lame, it's stupid, it sucks, but in the end, they're not getting laid and we are, so who cares.

[GreatWhiteShark]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

Its stat padding report it!

[BeerStein]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

... they're not getting laid and we are, so who cares.

dammit - I knew I was on the wrong server!

[Bram_Toker]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

Too obvious.......unless the 1st pilot was unaware that he was being followed...highly unlikely though.

[CAG|Puppet]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

It's lame, it's stupid, it sucks, but in the end, they're not getting laid and we are, so who cares.

Are you aware that you're talking to 10yr olds?

[JDUB]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

Are you aware that you're talking to 10yr olds?

:laugh: So true, so true. I've pretty much given up trying to invoke any sort of intelligent conversation in this forum. :)

[Chalk.One]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

It's very common to see the Mi17 follow the BH around. Why? Because it has no chance in hell of taking down the BH. So you make the best of it. Stay away from its guns and recap the flags.

[Attila]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

Are you aware that you're talking to 10yr olds?

Oh, I thought we were talking ABOUT 10 year olds.

[DU_is_good_4U]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

It's lame, it's stupid, it sucks, but in the end, they're not getting laid and we are, so who cares.

You get laid, I'm a computer geek and I have not got laid for seven years, how do you do it?

[glasseye]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

Is collusion exploitative? Is this against EA/DICE's EULA or something?

i would say it does. most likely to fall under the same kind of 'grey dodge bits' clause that knife/pistol servers do.

[DrunkenPirate]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

Just go AT and shoot them down, if they are hovering then they are easy targets, let them cry about it.
There are also a load of Vodniks/HMMVW's about, the mounted .50 calibre gun will ruin their day guranteed.

[PIMP]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

Who gives a rat's a$$? Leave the server and join one of the other gazillion servers.

[Sneaky Assassin]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

I doubt they were working together, but if your mec it's the best thing to do with the heli, follow the BH around they never look behind them and you score the same amount it's just whoring in a different heli.

[dark-eye]

Re: Is collusion exploitative? Blackhawk+Mi-17 squads working together?

dammit - I knew I was on the wrong server!

No you where on the right server but, like always drunk