How likely is it that you think EA/Dice will fix the vehicle physics in the next patch? If it has allready been anounced that they are going/not going to fix the problem redirect me please...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Probabilty of Vehicle Physics Fixed?
Collapse
X
-
Re: Probabilty of Vehicle Physics Fixed?
they are really good except for two things i can think of:
Helicopters should be able to change altitude A LOT faster, not really slow and smooth all the time.
Jets need to glide when you let go of the thrust button, DICE forgot to put momentum into that, or else they made it so that you can .... put your thrusters to backwards or something...
Comment
-
Re: Probabilty of Vehicle Physics Fixed?
found this somewherer
""........
Improved physics of vehicles against soldiers so that soldiers are not as easily killed by moving vehicles.
Auto team balance no longer moves the commander or squad leaders to the other team.
Limits placed on ability to point farm.
Criteria for gaining ranks and awards has been changed.
........""
Comment
-
Re: Probabilty of Vehicle Physics Fixed?
they are really good except for two things i can think of:
Helicopters should be able to change altitude A LOT faster, not really slow and smooth all the time.
Jets need to glide when you let go of the thrust button, DICE forgot to put momentum into that, or else they made it so that you can .... put your thrusters to backwards or something...
If anything aircraft should be patched so they are weaker to prevent them from horing the entire theater. You must be kidding
Comment
-
Re: Probabilty of Vehicle Physics Fixed?
Originally posted by scott111Give me a serious break..
If anything aircraft should be patched so they are weaker to prevent them from horing the entire theater. You must be kidding
If anything would combat the jets, it would be the way the AA missiles work, not the strength of jets. That only multiplies the chance of a TK tenfold from a stray missile, and we all know that happens way too often already. If the missiles would lock onto one target and fire at it, and not veer off after getting to it, it'd be fine.
Comment
Comment