so im gonna buy a 64 4000+. im lookin on newegg for prices and i see the clawhammer and san diego core versions...now i donno the diffrence between the two cored, i have a vague memory of someoen telling me the san diego cores better...but id like some advice on wich way to go...
clawhammer vs San Diego core...
Collapse
X
-
xolinlevhTags: None -
Gunny Highway
Re: clawhammer vs San Diego core...
You can take a look at this article on OC of a AMD 64 3000+ Venice core, it gives good description of the new Venice and San Diego cores, the only difference between Venice and San Diego is the size of cache, so description is same or similar:
If you've already got a decent S939 motherboard on your hands it would be almost criminal not to try an Athlon 64 3000+ E3-stepping CPU. Sure, it's not hugely fast at default speeds, but I'd be amazed if 2.5GHz wasn't a given and 3GHz on the cards with better cooling. There's just something rather naughty but nice about 50% overclocks with near-default voltage. For once, you can have your cake and eat it! Yum.
in short difference or improvements are lower temps and uses less voltage, and better memory controller and sse3 instructions . -
djstubbs -
xolinlevh
Re: clawhammer vs San Diego core...
Originally posted by Gunny HighwayYou can take a look at this article on OC of a AMD 64 3000+ Venice core, it gives good description of the new Venice and San Diego cores, the only difference between Venice and San Diego is the size of cache, so description is same or similar:
If you've already got a decent S939 motherboard on your hands it would be almost criminal not to try an Athlon 64 3000+ E3-stepping CPU. Sure, it's not hugely fast at default speeds, but I'd be amazed if 2.5GHz wasn't a given and 3GHz on the cards with better cooling. There's just something rather naughty but nice about 50% overclocks with near-default voltage. For once, you can have your cake and eat it! Yum.
in short difference or improvements are lower temps and uses less voltage, and better memory controller and sse3 instructions .
thanks for advice....but i dont need to know about venice core...its claw vs sanComment
-
xolinlevh
Re: clawhammer vs San Diego core...
ok :) thats what i was leanin toards...now i just gotta save up around...$500 mroe and im set! :)Originally posted by djstubbsGet the San Diego CoreComment
-
djstubbs -
Re: clawhammer vs San Diego core...
I thought that the Clawhammer was for Socket 754 only?
The San Diego is a monster in gaming because of the full 1MB of L2 cache compared to the 512kb of the Venice.Comment
-
scott123 -
xolinlevh
Re: clawhammer vs San Diego core...
ok kewl, so ive decided on my new setup:
ASUS A8N-SLI Premium
AMD 64 4000+ SD core
Asus GeForce 7800 GTX Extreme 256MB DDR3/PCI-E/VIVO/Dual-DVI
1 gig ddr400/pc3200 corsair RAM
sound good?Comment
-
scott123 -
xolinlevh
Re: clawhammer vs San Diego core...
yea i will eventually, but for right now im on a rather limited budget, im still savin up for this, another few weeks and i can afford it all, but after a while il buy anotehr gig or so :)Comment
-
xolinlevh
Re: clawhammer vs San Diego core...
oh one other question for peopel, ive never bought any specal fans for my CPU, but sence im gettin such a nice one, i think il buy somethign OTHER then stock. Thermalright XP-120 is a good one im told...with a 120mm fan on it?Comment
Comment