Is this game's infantry combat crap?

[5150 Joker]

Lets see some more opinions. I disagree that it should have been more realistic - 2-3 shots SHOULD kill an opponent and a single headshot should as well but that's as far as I'd like it to go. However, the movement should have been faster and too much realism like AA would have sucked.

[shadow_wolf]

IMO it should have been more like CSS, the way it is now everything is very underpowered. Also the infantry walk far too slow as well, the walking speed should have been 2x what it is now.

If this games infantry combat was like CSS I would have dropped this game the day I first played it.

[American Infidel]

BF2 infantry Combat is so much better than CS's in my opinion, and great in its own right.

[Flux_69]

i dont like the accuracy of the weapons, but it's well balanced..in BFV you can lay down and kill ppl with an m60 at nearly 300 meters...the BFV weapons are a bit to accurate...and the BF2 weapons are not accurate enough...

[tehpwnerofnoobs]

I think it rocks, few minor inbalances, if tweaked, would make it totally rock. The only thing I don't like is how armor whores can mess it up by spawn camping the primary spawns.

[Pilioka]

The major flaw with anything infantry is there is always a tank somewhere which ruins it half the time.

Now subtract the armor.

Bunny hopping is pretty lame and needs fixed somehow. Jumping and going prone needs fixed. Uh...that's prolly about it. Everything else is bout fine.

[StabbyTheHobo]

IMO it should have been more like CSS, the way it is now everything is very underpowered. Also the infantry walk far too slow as well, the walking speed should have been 2x what it is now.

I disagree. I think infantry moves at a perfect speed, and the weapon damage is fine. Compairing BF2 to CS:S isn't really practical if you keep the considerable difference in map sizes in mind. Having the realistic damage that CS:S has on a BF2 map would mean you'd spend 90% of your time running back into the fight, as opposed to actually fighting.