the NEW X800GT

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Merlin
    Member
    • Apr 2007
    • 861

    #31
    Originally posted by Sniper_13
    wow it killed the 6600gt.
    I take it you refer to the fps counts a couple of posts up. You will notice that that was at max rez and AA & AF. No one would run the 6600GT at those levels. I recon at 1024 x 768 with AA & AF off the marks for both cards would be a bit closer.

    Comment

    • Nomad2k3

      #32
      Originally posted by Sharp
      Has anyone seen one for sale yet?



      who reckons nvidia retaliate with a similar priced vanilla 6800? mibbee a 512 mb version too?......ohh they allready did that
      like the way they using the GT moniker for mid range products.....ssneaky :laugh: should be enough to confuzzle the n00bs too...

      Comment

      • Merlin
        Member
        • Apr 2007
        • 861

        #33
        Personally I dont know why Radeon have even bothered to release this card as the X800 Pro is better and is currently very cheap + it has 12 pilelines not the 8 the X80GT has. The PCI-E X800 Pro is currently the best bang for buck PCI-E card the is at the moment, IMO that is.

        Comment

        • dutser

          #34
          That comparison chart is made by Powercolor and I'd give it zero value. If someone is really wanting to buy a X800GT 8-pipe card(which performs quite well being 8-pipe), wait for some _real_ test results. But keep in mind 16-pipe cards are going pretty cheap now that 7800 series have been launched.

          Comment

          • Nomad2k3

            #35
            IMO its nothing more than a bite back at nvidia,
            ATi are basically saying "were making GT class cards, midrange" its this sort of confusion that helps sell cards, a newbie to pc hardware will see it has a GT moniker , see its cheaper than an nvidia GT class card and buy it...

            thats all i think anyways, however i am a little wired today lol :p

            Comment

            • $G-MONEY SMITH$

              #36
              true nubs seem to get extrememly confused when it comes to hardware.

              Comment

              • OminousLull
                Member
                • Jan 2005
                • 103

                #37
                Anybody notice the chart shows the comparison between a 256MB X800GT and a 128MB 6600GT? Yeah that's a fair scientific approach.

                Comment

                • dBs

                  #38
                  Originally posted by OminousLull
                  Anybody notice the chart shows the comparison between a 256MB X800GT and a 128MB 6600GT? Yeah that's a fair scientific approach.
                  The 128mb GT is the faster of the 2 6600 cards available. If they had used the slower 256mb version the differences would have been even worse. I dont put much faith in these stats though but thats besides the point =)

                  Comment

                  Working...