Originally posted by Sniper_13
the NEW X800GT
Collapse
X
-
who reckons nvidia retaliate with a similar priced vanilla 6800? mibbee a 512 mb version too?......ohh they allready did thatOriginally posted by SharpHas anyone seen one for sale yet?

like the way they using the GT moniker for mid range products.....ssneaky :laugh: should be enough to confuzzle the n00bs too...Comment
-
Personally I dont know why Radeon have even bothered to release this card as the X800 Pro is better and is currently very cheap + it has 12 pilelines not the 8 the X80GT has. The PCI-E X800 Pro is currently the best bang for buck PCI-E card the is at the moment, IMO that is.Comment
-
That comparison chart is made by Powercolor and I'd give it zero value. If someone is really wanting to buy a X800GT 8-pipe card(which performs quite well being 8-pipe), wait for some _real_ test results. But keep in mind 16-pipe cards are going pretty cheap now that 7800 series have been launched.Comment
-
IMO its nothing more than a bite back at nvidia,
ATi are basically saying "were making GT class cards, midrange" its this sort of confusion that helps sell cards, a newbie to pc hardware will see it has a GT moniker , see its cheaper than an nvidia GT class card and buy it...
thats all i think anyways, however i am a little wired today lol :pComment
-
Anybody notice the chart shows the comparison between a 256MB X800GT and a 128MB 6600GT? Yeah that's a fair scientific approach.Comment
-
The 128mb GT is the faster of the 2 6600 cards available. If they had used the slower 256mb version the differences would have been even worse. I dont put much faith in these stats though but thats besides the point =)Originally posted by OminousLullAnybody notice the chart shows the comparison between a 256MB X800GT and a 128MB 6600GT? Yeah that's a fair scientific approach.Comment
Comment