just wondering what everyones opinion is on this..
I hate seeing people with high kills at the top of the scoreboard and getting medals when they have HIGH death rates also.. like someone who is 25 kills
25 deaths. thats +0 because while they took away 25 enemy tickets,
they got 25 of their own teams tickets taken away.
now lets say a player has 12 kills and 2 deaths, thats +10
i'd rather have that player in my squad.. but according to the game he's not as good as the guy that died 25 times getting his 25 kills.
Why cant the scores be based on KD ratio.. so the board would put who
has the most kills - deaths at the top?
the guy that gets high kills but dies almost as much is worthless to the team
(atleast he isnt one of those guys that goes like 1 kill 12 deaths in a round).
I hate seeing people with high kills at the top of the scoreboard and getting medals when they have HIGH death rates also.. like someone who is 25 kills
25 deaths. thats +0 because while they took away 25 enemy tickets,
they got 25 of their own teams tickets taken away.
now lets say a player has 12 kills and 2 deaths, thats +10
i'd rather have that player in my squad.. but according to the game he's not as good as the guy that died 25 times getting his 25 kills.
Why cant the scores be based on KD ratio.. so the board would put who
has the most kills - deaths at the top?
the guy that gets high kills but dies almost as much is worthless to the team
(atleast he isnt one of those guys that goes like 1 kill 12 deaths in a round).
Comment