Statistics don't lie, Beta HAS been a disappointment, let your voice heard, speak up!
I would like to bring the "what's obvious" to everyone's attention, that is, the BETA of BF3, as far as a "BF2 sequel" is concerned has been a failure. You can go to EA UK forums for BF3 and see for yourselves, this is a poll that I had posted there (http://forums.electronicarts.co.uk/b...ppointing.html) and you can see within 2 days, with nearly 200 votes, %65 of the people agree that it has been a disappointment for a BF2 sequel.
This is a game that we all have been waiting for nearly 5 years. This is the Battlefield 3, not Bad Company 3. DICE got carried away and got lost in the process of making sales. That's all fine, then this game should have been called Battlefield : Bad Company 3, not Battlefield 3. The name "Battlefield 3" has a very big meaning to itself.
This is not just 1 or 2 whiner complaining, this is EVERYWHERE in every forum, in every thread about beta, people are disappointed. So let your voice be heard, we know DICE is reading these forums, make them understand that they need to do something about this.
Personally, I and 4 other friends have cancelled our pre-orders, along with 2 x 64 player server subscriptions. We want to buy this game and play it, but not in this condition.
We are not against change. What DICE has done is not a new FPS paradigm that goes into positive direction. Instead of building on top of the existing game, BF2, they have removed existing features, dumbing down the game. They haven't made something better, they have made it for the worse.
People LOVED BF2. Yes they hated its unfairness and some bugs here and there, but the overall gameplay and the core aspects of what makes BF2 "the" Battlefield game, we all LOVED. There was no reason as to why they had to break a perfectly working game, remove things that we all loved.
Instead of removing the commander mode, they should have enhanced it.
Instead of dumbing down the squads, they should have enhanced it.
Instead of giving auto-heal for soldiers and armor, they should have made the game better such that you don't nead auto-heal.
Instead of making armor completely useless with %50 disable, they should have enhanced it by giving different rounds and protections.
And lastly... Instead of making unlocks the "purpose" of the game, they should have kept them as aids in the game. They have created such a system that you can not succeed without unlocks. In BF2, a good player with a M203, could always succeed in a good team. Now it's about who has the flare unlock or the bomb unlock or the shock paddles unlock.
And now, it's not about who is a better player, it's more about who aims and shoots first. Well DICE, hear this out, we already have a game that does that perfectly fine, it's called "Call of Duty". Your pearl, Battelfield 2, was the leading game in its class, before you destroy it forever, do something about it.
This is a game that we all have been waiting for nearly 5 years. This is the Battlefield 3, not Bad Company 3. DICE got carried away and got lost in the process of making sales. That's all fine, then this game should have been called Battlefield : Bad Company 3, not Battlefield 3. The name "Battlefield 3" has a very big meaning to itself.
This is not just 1 or 2 whiner complaining, this is EVERYWHERE in every forum, in every thread about beta, people are disappointed. So let your voice be heard, we know DICE is reading these forums, make them understand that they need to do something about this.
Personally, I and 4 other friends have cancelled our pre-orders, along with 2 x 64 player server subscriptions. We want to buy this game and play it, but not in this condition.
We are not against change. What DICE has done is not a new FPS paradigm that goes into positive direction. Instead of building on top of the existing game, BF2, they have removed existing features, dumbing down the game. They haven't made something better, they have made it for the worse.
People LOVED BF2. Yes they hated its unfairness and some bugs here and there, but the overall gameplay and the core aspects of what makes BF2 "the" Battlefield game, we all LOVED. There was no reason as to why they had to break a perfectly working game, remove things that we all loved.
Instead of removing the commander mode, they should have enhanced it.
Instead of dumbing down the squads, they should have enhanced it.
Instead of giving auto-heal for soldiers and armor, they should have made the game better such that you don't nead auto-heal.
Instead of making armor completely useless with %50 disable, they should have enhanced it by giving different rounds and protections.
And lastly... Instead of making unlocks the "purpose" of the game, they should have kept them as aids in the game. They have created such a system that you can not succeed without unlocks. In BF2, a good player with a M203, could always succeed in a good team. Now it's about who has the flare unlock or the bomb unlock or the shock paddles unlock.
And now, it's not about who is a better player, it's more about who aims and shoots first. Well DICE, hear this out, we already have a game that does that perfectly fine, it's called "Call of Duty". Your pearl, Battelfield 2, was the leading game in its class, before you destroy it forever, do something about it.
Comment