BF3 Speed Test Battlelog vs. In-game Browser
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: BF3 Speed Test Battlelog vs. In-game Browser
Yeah, it's a bit strange. I think Battlelog has actually degraded in quality since the alpha, but perhaps it is just a side-effect of of more people accessing it.Originally posted by Chief82Yeah, I'll buy that. It does seem to get me in game a bit quicker. Going through a browser will just take a little getting use to...but it doesn't bother me too much. All the available info is kind of nice.Battlelog/Origin ID - Hurricane043Comment
-
Re: BF3 Speed Test Battlelog vs. In-game Browser
Well done. I am seeing the same speed with me using Steam BC2 vs. Origin BF3. I was going to make a video as well on this, but I dont see much point now
CrunchTwitter: @CptainCrunch
Battlelog/Origin: CptainCrunchComment
-
Re: BF3 Speed Test Battlelog vs. In-game Browser
Yeah from my memory the BC2 browser system was clunky. And knowing Dice they seem to continually drop the ball on their server browsers.Comment
-
Re: BF3 Speed Test Battlelog vs. In-game Browser
How are the pings supposed to be accurate? If a webserver in Texas gets a 50ms ping to a server and I join it in the UK my ping is going to be 200+. The ping count is useless in this browser, they need to add a region filter; North West Europe/South West Europe/Eastern Europe/etc.
Comment
-
Re: BF3 Speed Test Battlelog vs. In-game Browser
Because the Battlelog installs something on your end so that the ping is coming from your PC to the game server, not the web browser.Originally posted by Mavrik347How are the pings supposed to be accurate? If a webserver in Texas gets a 50ms ping to a server and I join it in the UK my ping is going to be 200+. The ping count is useless in this browser, they need to add a region filter; North West Europe/South West Europe/Eastern Europe/etc.Comment
Comment