sup

[Vreki]

Re: sup

Yes, but it is g-d annoying when an objective is wide open to snipers, because you are stuck at that location during the capture.
And so you get splattered from afar without having any chance of cleansing the objective. It is poor gameplay and it teaches people to not go for the objectives.

Objectives should be strongholds.

[Spik3d]

Re: sup

Sure it's annoying, it's also annoying when an enemy spawns on the flag your capping, or a jet strafes it, or the commander puts artillery on it. Just because it's annoying doesn't mean it's poor gameplay. It's different gameplay. And if whoever is playing has no ambition, then yes it will teach them not to go for the objectives, but most players learned from the experiences and anticipated it and better countered it.

[buteonidae]

Re: sup

I will be coming back! WO ****ing hooo can't wait, but I need to get some money to get a new PC first

[LunaTiK TunaLiK]

Re: sup

Yep, but now games have gone in the other direction of keeping that same 32 players and cramming them in maps smaller than 1/5th the size.

Also, anyone remember this (TBF2 v BF2P):

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f389/Spik3d/TBF2%20vs%20BF2P/round-1.png

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f389/Spik3d/TBF2%20vs%20BF2P/round-2.png

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f3...2P/round-3.png

I remember they wouldn't put me on the right team. Finally went live so I started team killing people.

[CptainCrunch]

Re: sup

LOL, I cant believe they wouldnt move you. Glad you still saw them as the enemy

Crunch

[signa]

Re: sup

wait, you played in that match?

[DTPleeoswald]

Re: sup

I'm back and definitely will be back. Actually thought about popping in BF2 on this new PC and seeing if I lost my touch at all haha. It feels good to be back in the BF community. As for maps and servers I always preferred 64 player maps but on 32 player servers. More area to move around especially since I favored Karkand which was a giant fragorgy with 64 players.