I still prefer good old conquest

[jake_]

Re: I still prefer good old conquest

I suck at Battlefield. My pr0 kdr in 2142 ended up at .68, and I am cruising along at .62 in BC2. I am VERY good at TF2. My KDR on the only server that I play on is always between 4 and 6. And, surprisingly enough, I have a ~1.5 kdr in MW2 on the 360. I just do not understand. I have fun with Battlefield, but you really don't want me in your squad.

Poor kirk.

I can attest to this though. He's a BEAST in TF2.

[H4yd3n]

Re: I still prefer good old conquest

I only have a 1.55~ kdr since I screw around with friends way too much.

Tbh, I think it's easier to get a good kdr in this game than it is in say 2142.

[Lordsethonan]

Re: I still prefer good old conquest

only if your team isn't made of clueless newbies. Run of the mills newbies at least don't congest the doorways while you are running away from a tank shell, or have the decency to ask how to do things and learn. Noobs on the other hands refuse to spawn as engineer even when they are the only ones dying.

[Rambo]

Re: I still prefer good old conquest

Actually for a stubborn ole vet like me i dont mind rush so much now(as long as you actually have people defend and no jihads haxors)

[Chaoszx]

Re: I still prefer good old conquest

I would prefer conquest if the matches didn't last only 10 minutes. Seriously, this is a hugely dumbed down version of what conquest is suppose to be.

[Lordsethonan]

Re: I still prefer good old conquest

I would prefer conquest if the matches didn't last only 10 minutes. Seriously, this is a hugely dumbed down version of what conquest is suppose to be.

I'm not arguing but arguing's sake; exactly dumbed down how? I've been in a couple of matches with capable players on both teams, and they can be pretty dragged on up to half an hour. They only go fast when one team completely dominates the other and forces ticket bleed.

[WolfAlmighty]

Re: I still prefer good old conquest

I'm not arguing but arguing's sake; exactly dumbed down how? I've been in a couple of matches with capable players on both teams, and they can be pretty dragged on up to half an hour. They only go fast when one team completely dominates the other and forces ticket bleed.

Unless the teams are composed of mostly medics and/or the server is half full or less, the conquest rounds do go by right quick. Obviously rounds that go down to the wire last longer, but I've yet to see a round last a half hour. Even BF2 rounds seldom lasted that long.

[The_Eliminator]

Re: I still prefer good old conquest

I have had a few rounds last half an hour but generally this is when there are fewer players on the server.