Pathetic Ban reasons

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • groundedzero
    I AM THE EMBODIMENT OF /b/
    • Feb 2008
    • 2923

    #16
    Re: Pathetic Ban reasons

    Originally posted by CptainCrunch
    This is the reason why I liked the idea of IWnet. I know I speak blasphame, but it was nice to not have to worry about something like this.

    Crunch
    I hate to say this but............................................... ....... agreed.

    *hides*

    Comment

    • Odedge
      Member
      • Sep 2007
      • 285

      #17
      Re: Pathetic Ban reasons

      Originally posted by CptainCrunch
      This is the reason why I liked the idea of IWnet. I know I speak blasphame, but it was nice to not have to worry about something like this.

      Crunch
      In a way you do, there is a reason why "The Zone" is no more for FPS games. Just to understand, when you are in a "server" using IWnet, you can't kick people? If so, that just makes it harder to get rid of cheaters and such.

      In BF 2,. of all the time I got banned from a game, once I deserved for my profanity in the text chat (which was a problem for me in that game), the other "justified" reason was that I called the admins idiots because they banned my friend and helicopter gunner for something he didn't do (I was the pilot).

      In this game, I have only gotten kicked once and that was because on Laguna Alta <sp>. I was in the Bradley guarding base "A". I was guarding the road coming from their main. When an enemy or armor was spotted I fired. They had a rule about not attacking uncaps, which I think is a good rule, especially in this game. But since I was firing at red dots (3d spotting), I wasn't aware it was the outlet of their main. Ultimately, he should kick the maker of that map for such a badly designed map!

      Comment

      • The_Eliminator
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2006
        • 5486

        #18
        Re: Pathetic Ban reasons

        Originally posted by CptainCrunch
        This is the reason why I liked the idea of IWnet. I know I speak blasphame, but it was nice to not have to worry about something like this.

        Crunch
        Yes you just had to worry about the 4 wall hackers and 3 aimbots flying around the map.

        Comment

        • imported_Kalo
          Member
          • Jan 2007
          • 318

          #19
          Re: Pathetic Ban reasons

          Originally posted by Roamer
          If EA wants a consistent experience then they should provide servers free of charge.
          So they get to deny players content EVEN THOUGH they payed for it? I think I understand. But you're still wrong.

          Comment

          • CptainCrunch
            I am the 1%
            • Oct 2007
            • 12976

            #20
            Re: Pathetic Ban reasons

            It is true that there are hackers in MW2, as there is in this game.

            Don't get me wrong, I dont think IWnet was awesome and I would actually prefer a hybrid system. I am just saying that it was nice to be able to use whatever kit or loadout I wanted and not have to worry about some strange or unknown rule on the server.

            I was banned on a BC2 server the first day, because the admin was testing his tools and didnt care who he banned.

            Its good to be back.

            Crunch
            Twitter: @CptainCrunch
            Battlelog/Origin: CptainCrunch

            Comment

            • 74javelin
              Member
              • Jan 2006
              • 179

              #21
              Re: Pathetic Ban reasons

              i wouldn't worry about bans right now. since when they restart the server or is crashes. they lose the ban list.

              Comment

              Working...