Bf 2 vs bf 2142

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RW-RogueWolf

    #31
    Re: Bf 2 vs bf 2142

    Originally posted by TheQ
    All my wins and championships wont get me layed in a bar.
    Why would you get layed in bar lol :laugh:

    :p Your sorted in my books mate, i second your notion.

    Comment

    • therealmat
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2007
      • 1783

      #32
      Re: Bf 2 vs bf 2142

      Originally posted by iQue
      Just like the good old days before TBF2 and TBF2142 were merged...

      :wee:
      Good times. :wee:

      but 2142 fo' sho' :yay:
      *dons flame proof vest*

      Comment

      • [55RA]W|Pvt.shiftydood

        #33
        Re: Bf 2 vs bf 2142

        Originally posted by iQue
        Just like the good old days before TBF2 and TBF2142 were merged...

        :wee:
        yes, the good old days... i still remember when you had to have 2 different accounts...

        Comment

        • WolfAlmighty
          Artillery Magnet
          • Jan 2007
          • 2113

          #34
          Re: Bf 2 vs bf 2142

          Originally posted by TheQ
          Let me help you out:thumbsup:




          VS



          As for "disrespected"I judge a man by the content of his life,NOT the web or game play.If your on the web and play Vid games to be respected then you should take a second look at your life.I see guys like you every day in 2142/Bf2 twl forums dying to be respected.All my wins and championships wont get me layed in a bar.So stop thinking that this is real.
          :laugh:

          Yes, I understand that discussing games isn't 'real', but at the same time the people to whom you are speaking online are, in fact, people and not just zeros and ones. Therefore, you should consider speaking to people online as though you were speaking to them in real life. This is what I mean by respect. I'm not 'dying to be respected', I'm simply asking for the same civility you would show any other human being who you would meet in the real world.

          Dig? :)

          Comment

          • TheQ
            Member
            • Jul 2008
            • 34

            #35
            Re: Bf 2 vs bf 2142

            Originally posted by WolfAlmighty
            :laugh:

            Yes, I understand that discussing games isn't 'real', but at the same time the people to whom you are speaking online are, in fact, people and not just zeros and ones. Therefore, you should consider speaking to people online as though you were speaking to them in real life. This is what I mean by respect. I'm not 'dying to be respected', I'm simply asking for the same civility you would show any other human being who you would meet in the real world.

            Dig? :)
            Maybe me and you got of on a bad startbut i did explain to you my thread.and you did think that i was new:thumbsup:But i am the guy to have his hand up the monalisa dress and the other in sh*t lol

            Comment

            • WolfAlmighty
              Artillery Magnet
              • Jan 2007
              • 2113

              #36
              Re: Bf 2 vs bf 2142

              Originally posted by TheQ
              Maybe me and you got of on a bad startbut i did explain to you my thread.and you did think that i was new:thumbsup:But i am the guy to have his hand up the monalisa dress and the other in sh*t lol
              No worries, just a simple misunderstanding. :) I wasn't clear if you meant to compare the games based on infantry/Gib/Karkand or the games as a whole.

              I didn't mean to imply that you were new (well, new to TBF perhaps, not the games). My first post was just a kind of tongue-in-cheek remark about the current state of BF and that most servers are Karkand or Gibraltar, so I apologise if that came off as insulting.

              Anyway, seems we're on the same page here, so thanks for understanding. :salute:

              Comment

              • CptainCrunch
                I am the 1%
                • Oct 2007
                • 12976

                #37
                Re: Bf 2 vs bf 2142

                Well, let us all just hold hands now and sing. :dead:

                In the game, I think of people as 1s and 0s otherwise I would have a problem killing them.

                That and I like to think I destroyed the universe by turning off my PC every night

                :yay: 2142 :yay:

                Crunch
                Twitter: @CptainCrunch
                Battlelog/Origin: CptainCrunch

                Comment

                • RW-RogueWolf

                  #38
                  Re: Bf 2 vs bf 2142

                  Originally posted by CptainCrunch
                  Well, let us all just hold hands now and sing. :dead:

                  In the game, I think of people as 1s and 0s otherwise I would have a problem killing them.

                  That and I like to think I destroyed the universe by turning off my PC every night

                  :yay: 2142 :yay:

                  Crunch
                  :laugh: Nice

                  Comment

                  • DontKnockIt225
                    Member
                    • Nov 2006
                    • 516

                    #39
                    Re: Bf 2 vs bf 2142

                    Air combat in BF2 is more diverse than in 2142.
                    Simply put there is 2 kinds of vehicals. I feel BF2 is ahead on this aspect.

                    Tanks and cars are better on bf2, because of the access to machine gun. This is effective very effective against air vehicals.

                    Maps: I think this is down to personal prefernce.
                    I think BF2 maps are more diverse which would put them ahead. Eg. solid vehical maps, infantry and vehical maps and infantry maps. For me this would be in BF2s favour however I would have some bias because i'm a bf2 player.

                    Guns - 2142 guns are smoother.

                    Unlocks go in 2142's favour.

                    Titan: brilliant addition to 2142.


                    I believe BF2 is a head because of:
                    Air vehicle diversity
                    Tanks and cars have better machine guns.
                    More variation in the maps.

                    BF2 falls short with:
                    Guns
                    Unlocks
                    Titan

                    However I would say the former are more influential factors in the game and thus I believe BF2 comes out on top.

                    Comment

                    • Minmaster
                      I DON'T PLAY CS!
                      • Nov 2006
                      • 4112

                      #40
                      Re: Bf 2 vs bf 2142

                      Originally posted by DontKnockIt225
                      Air combat in BF2 is more diverse than in 2142.
                      this was done on purpose after they realized BF2 air rapage was a bit too much. yes BF2 has more diversity when it comes to vehicles, but i don't mind the simplicity of how vehicles are in 2142.

                      Comment

                      • unreal_calibur
                        Member
                        • Jun 2007
                        • 84

                        #41
                        Re: Bf 2 vs bf 2142

                        its nice to have a more diverse game but it shouldn't have balance issues. all jets were overpowered really. a good pilot won't get taken down by a aa or anything, only another jet.

                        as for the tanks, bf2 tanks had a massive advantage against infantry. you had two tiny spots were tanks were weak. in 2142 the whole back had was a weak spot which ment you can't just go guns blazing against 5 infantry. pretty much everything in 2142 is better balanced than bf2. also for the turrent, it gave infantry a chance to run away in 2142.

                        Comment

                        • Wizrdwarts
                          Member
                          • Dec 2006
                          • 3754

                          #42
                          Re: Bf 2 vs bf 2142

                          I think what DICE meant to replace the BF2 tanks' roles with the walker, and focus the tank on longer range combat. I mean the 2142 tanks don't even get coaxial MGs.

                          Comment

                          • DontKnockIt225
                            Member
                            • Nov 2006
                            • 516

                            #43
                            Re: Bf 2 vs bf 2142

                            Why should a tank be close to equal vs an infantry unit? Surly that defeats the point of it? Unless the point is for intimidation. Ahh very ingenius Mr Bond.

                            Comment

                            Working...