Conquest or Titan?

[golfisfun]

Re: Conquest or Titan?

titan is funner when there are 40 people or more on the server

64 man titan servers are a beast.

[hooahguy]

Re: Conquest or Titan?

for me, conquest. titan is way too slow, and while assaulting the titan is always fun, the tedious job of capturing all the silos and having gunship spammers harass you and all that stuff doesnt make it so enjoyable.
the only server i would play titan on is a TG server, since they insist on teamwork, which makes everything enjoyable. on other servers id find that in some cases squads would assault as one, but mostly its one at a time, just to get slaughtered by some sentry gun.
but since 90% of the times i only see the second case, i very rarely play titan. in fact, i dont think ive played titan since ive gotten back to BF2142....

[imported_Harlequin]

Re: Conquest or Titan?

I like both, but have always had a preference for Titan as it's something a little different.

Having said that, though, I do like servers to rotate all the maps. Even the best maps can become boring with constant repetition. As the old saying goes, "a change is as good as a rest"!

[golfisfun]

Re: Conquest or Titan?

A ton of us from here should play on the weekend sometime.

[EnergyNL]

Re: Conquest or Titan?

definitely conquest
1. gibraltar
2. cebrere
3. tunis

32 man max servers.

I just really like infantery combat action.

[imported_Rafterman]

Re: Conquest or Titan?

I consider Titan to be Conquest Plus.

It just gives so many options - capture silos until you get tired of that, defend the titan, use the guns, go back to silos, etc.

[BobTheJob]

Re: Conquest or Titan?

I like conquest, mostly because fighting inside the titan get tiresome after about five minuets. and when half your team is doing so fighting over silos becomes driving cars around and practicing your parking.

[messfeeder]

Re: Conquest or Titan?

conquest FTW!

[Yoster]

Re: Conquest or Titan?

Both, but titan more for me. I dont know why, but there is just something extra fun and epic when strategizing on how to bring down a beast with your team.

[ohsosharp]

Re: Conquest or Titan?

Both.

[hooahguy]

Re: Conquest or Titan?

Both, but titan more for me. I dont know why, but there is just something extra fun and epic when strategizing on how to bring down a beast with your team.

that is, when the strategize.
most teams dont.

[Moteeph73]

Re: Conquest or Titan?

Titan with occasional conquest for variety. Love the server(s? only know of one) that rotates all maps and both modes.

[imported_Field]

Re: Conquest or Titan?

problem w/ that is the lag gets horrible. on the ground, it's not so bad. but once you board the titan, it's like playing a slide show

wtf is wrong with you you have a good computer and you work in networking or some computer job but you still have some merlin magic lag problems i dont get it.

and youve played the game as long as i have if you play titan on low-medium settings and its a slideshow just get a faster cpu and more ram seriously my take on getting a computer was it would be THE BEST price/value ratio ever seeing the number of hours you put into the game.

srsly i just either forgo shooting at the range or buying cheaper protien powder for a month and bam i got the cash to get a new gpu if i wanted and i dont even make huge bank

[Wizrdwarts]

Re: Conquest or Titan?

Titan still lags, it's not the clients' fault. I have a E8400 and it still drops down to ~50FPS on the titan with lots of action going on. And my FPS is usually hitting the 100 FPS cap.

[Minmaster]

Re: Conquest or Titan?

50fps on titan is nothin to complain about ... cmon now...