Dont flame but....

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DontKnockIt225
    Member
    • Nov 2006
    • 516

    #16
    Re: Dont flame but....

    Originally posted by WolfAlmighty
    Do you honestly believe they're going to increase the amount of kits, armies, weapons, maps, and player slots? Do you have any evidence of this? If not, then your argument is invalid. See? Speculation and extrapolation are equal-opportunity weapons.
    are you kidding? Why would a game be produced and advertised which only has 3maps? Obviously its either a test to be expanded on. Or more maps will be added. You cannot tell me that my argument is invalid like that lol. FOOL.

    Go do a history GCSE, it might teach you how to argue.



    Originally posted by WolfAlmighty
    It's in one of the interviews posted here, although I don't recall which one. As well, never did I say it was made specifically for consoles, that was you twisting my words. I said they were made 'with consoles in mind', meaning it's geared for the console crowd. Again, check the interviews posted here.
    Yeah this states that it will be avaliable on console. You just admitted yourself it is not made specifically for consoles. Why does allowing consoles to play, which they did with BF2, such a bad thing? Please tell me.

    Comment

    • jesus
      Member
      • May 2007
      • 2413

      #17
      Re: Dont flame but....

      Originally posted by DontKnockIt225
      are you kidding? Why would a game be produced and advertised which only has 3maps? Obviously its either a test to be expanded on. Or more maps will be added. You cannot tell me that my argument is invalid like that lol. FOOL.

      Go do a history GCSE, it might teach you how to argue.





      Yeah this states that it will be avaliable on console. You just admitted yourself it is not made specifically for consoles. Why does allowing consoles to play, which they did with BF2, such a bad thing? Please tell me.
      You haven't even played BF2 and BF2: Modern combat.

      Comment

      • DontKnockIt225
        Member
        • Nov 2006
        • 516

        #18
        Re: Dont flame but....

        ?? Yes i have

        Comment

        • jesus
          Member
          • May 2007
          • 2413

          #19
          Re: Dont flame but....

          Originally posted by DontKnockIt225
          ?? Yes i have
          You clearly haven't if you don't realize that BF1943 on PC will = BF1943 on consoles while BF2 on PC =/= BF2: modern combat on the consoles.

          Comment

          • DontKnockIt225
            Member
            • Nov 2006
            • 516

            #20
            Re: Dont flame but....

            Originally posted by Tomeis
            You clearly haven't if you don't realize that BF1943 on PC will = BF1943 on consoles while BF2 on PC =/= BF2: modern combat on the consoles.
            What evidence again do you have that says it will be entirely the same?

            The player cap is only a minor factor. What else is going to be consolised that will make the pc version bad? Please state everything.

            Comment

            • jesus
              Member
              • May 2007
              • 2413

              #21
              Re: Dont flame but....

              Originally posted by DontKnockIt225
              What evidence again do you have that says it will be entirely the same?

              The player cap is only a minor factor. What else is going to be consolised that will make the pc version bad? Please state everything.
              When did I say consolized? Don't put words in my mouth. Not only is it clear that you've never played BF2 or BF2:MC, but it's also quite clear that you really don't know that much about BF1943. DICE have said that ALL versions will have the 24 player limit, regenerating health, match making, infinite ammo, destructible environments, and the same 3 maps.

              That is quite a lot in common, is it not? Those things make up pretty much the whole game, do they not? The only thing BF2 and BF2: Modern combat had in common was the Battlefield name, and the modern warfare setting.

              PS: the player cap is certainly not a minor factor.

              Comment

              • RW-RogueWolf

                #22
                Re: Dont flame but....

                Originally posted by WolfAlmighty
                You're not going to get flamed for liking the game. Anyone who flames you for wanting to play this is ignorant. Those truly deservant of the flames are the ones at EA/DICE for making us excited about 2009 being the year for the PC gamer and then having this dropped on us instead. Now, I will be the first to reneg my comments should a true BF3 be announced, but for right now it looks like we have just been sold a bill of goods, and that's why the PC community is a bit irritated. The game in and of itself is probably fine, but for all we know this is the BF title that DICE was expecting us to wait for.

                I hope I'm wrong. Believe me, I hope I'm wrong.

                :shakehead: You make no sense, you are indeed a flid arnt you....

                Pick teddy up and go back to the cot...

                Comment

                • theminx
                  Member
                  • Sep 2007
                  • 350

                  #23
                  Re: Dont flame but....

                  Originally posted by Evil_Paladin
                  I actually like what this game features and what it is about. Before you flame, know that I never played the great battlefield 2 on the PC. My Pc sucks really bad. I have played battlefield 1942 thou. Im a console gamer, a PS3 owner to be exact. Im really looking forward to 1943. For one, Dog fights in mid air may not be new to most of you, but to me it is new! It looks wonderful! I also enjoyed bad company for the PS3 and modern combat that came out for the PS2. The game sounds down right fun and looks it too! I do admit thou that it was mostly catered towards console gamers like me. But I believe a pc only battlefield game is in the works.
                  and its the console gamer like you that they were trying to target, i think its great for that ..and nearly that purpose only unfortunately, myself im gunna try it out on the ps3 at gameshack or something but it wont be the same as pc..it never will..

                  Comment

                  • WolfAlmighty
                    Artillery Magnet
                    • Jan 2007
                    • 2113

                    #24
                    Re: Dont flame but....

                    Originally posted by TheGameArtist
                    :shakehead: You make no sense, you are indeed a flid arnt you....

                    Pick teddy up and go back to the cot...
                    Oh thy words, how they scathe! :laugh:

                    Comment

                    • RW-RogueWolf

                      #25
                      Re: Dont flame but....

                      Originally posted by WolfAlmighty
                      Oh thy words, how they scathe! :laugh:

                      :laugh: I Wuv you really

                      Comment

                      • baller87
                        Member
                        • Mar 2007
                        • 9

                        #26
                        Re: Dont flame but....

                        Originally posted by DontKnockIt225
                        The player cap is only a minor factor.
                        Have you played a battlefield game? player cap to to battlefield is like strategic maps/real time battles are to total war games

                        Comment

                        Working...