I choose quality of game play over graphics.

[AlexIsUber]

Re: I choose quality of game play over graphics.

bf2 gfx on ultra high are a beauty , sucks that **** like arty and planes ruin some good maps for inf

[[GCA]Tim270]

Re: I choose quality of game play over graphics.

COD4 is spray and pray nade fest, if that's what you consider skill then, 90% of gamers can do that. I don't consider killing 5 people with nades/claymores/P90's earning an airstrike and getting those 2 extra kills for the chopper to be consider skill.

And bf2 is not a nade fest? If you stay away from servers with more than 16 people in it then i assure you that the gameplay is better.


Even tho people whore choppers jets it still takes some skill to use them in BF2, not press 6 on your keyboard and camp in a corner while aimbot copter kills everyone.

Well you know, you can go inside or house or even shoot the chopper down.

[The_Mad_MoShah]

Re: I choose quality of game play over graphics.

I did actually play COD4 and got pretty good at it, but I ended up selling and going back to Battlefield 2. It just so much more fun!

[iQue]

Re: I choose quality of game play over graphics.

COD4 is spray and pray nade fest, if that's what you consider skill then, 90% of gamers can do that. I don't consider killing 5 people with nades/claymores/P90's earning an airstrike and getting those 2 extra kills for the chopper to be consider skill.

Now you're assuming TDM is the only gamemode in CoD4.

And I'm not talking about those horrible 40 player hardcore S&D servers, lol.

[Kylee!]

Re: I choose quality of game play over graphics.

COD4 is spray and pray nade fest, if that's what you consider skill then, 90% of gamers can do that. I don't consider killing 5 people with nades/claymores/P90's earning an airstrike and getting those 2 extra kills for the chopper to be consider skill.

Even tho people whore choppers jets it still takes some skill to use them in BF2, not press 6 on your keyboard and camp in a corner while aimbot copter kills everyone.

Allright, I'll use one of TGN's own members to prove you wrong.

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GwnySW7b2w[/media]

But if CoD4 is just a spray and pray nade fest, I'm sure you could do all that stuff too right?

[Redink]

Re: I choose quality of game play over graphics.

Sure there are plenty of other modes but it's still the same thing- small maps, mindless spraying and not a lot of ways to teamwork at all. To get everything that you say about COD to work is like trying to make a 40 man public raid in World of Warcraft = too much hassle!
What kills it for me the most is the ability to shoot through walls almost anywhere. People will exploit it and you can never hide behind anything.
Whenever I play COD4 I have the feeling like no one really matters much on the team and everyone is solo trying to grab as much kills as possible.
COD4 isn't a bad game but BF2 just gives me that feeling like you have a role in it which can help the team greatly. I don't know about everyone else but what makes me stick to BF2 is the group play and even sometimes you learn a lot from each other in the squad. It's a shame though that BF2 doesn't have a friend list to begin with otherwise I could of been playing with a lot of really cool people I have met along the way.

[=)BiT(= Evant3k]

Re: I choose quality of game play over graphics.

Allright, I'll use one of TGN's own members to prove you wrong.

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GwnySW7b2w[/media]

But if CoD4 is just a spray and pray nade fest, I'm sure you could do all that stuff too right?

You just prove my point about it being a camping game, you can totally ignore the objective which is destroy the bomb site and just kill everyone to win. Plus I don't like rounds that last no longer then 5 minutes, gets boring quick.


Whoever made the video assumes that watching the same clip 3 times is fun.. maybe that's the only footage that was any good. Plus its hardcore I could pull those shots of with a deagle, sniping in hardcore is a joke.

[AllFoamNoBeer]

Re: I choose quality of game play over graphics.

BF2 isn't any better. It's as boring, and as repetitive as any other MP game.

[ElFipso]

Re: I choose quality of game play over graphics.

BF2 isn't any better. It's as boring, and as repetitive as any other MP game.

The best way of not playing a repetetive game is NOT PLAYING REPETITIVE YOURSELF!
Just chnage your gaming style and you'll have a new angle to see the game.
If YOU repeat yourself playing, then it gets repetitive.

FipZ

[The_Mad_MoShah]

Re: I choose quality of game play over graphics.

BF2 isn't any better. It's as boring, and as repetitive as any other MP game.

I totally disagree. Everytime I play something different nearly always happens. different tactics, styles methods etc

[iQue]

Re: I choose quality of game play over graphics.

Plus its hardcore I could pull those shots of with a deagle, sniping in hardcore is a joke.

That's not hardcore - that's PAM4 and Promod, two very competitve mods for CoD4. Practically no difference in gun damage from vanilla.

But yeah the game is as repetitive as you play it. I hate it when people think Crysis is boring and they don't realise that there are many more ways to play it than "cloak and run, recharge cloak, cloak again"

I personally got tired of CoD4 but I still think it's brilliant and I play it from time to time.

[AllFoamNoBeer]

Re: I choose quality of game play over graphics.

The best way of not playing a repetetive game is NOT PLAYING REPETITIVE YOURSELF!
Just chnage your gaming style and you'll have a new angle to see the game.
If YOU repeat yourself playing, then it gets repetitive.

FipZ

That's a redundant argument, the same can be said for any game...
Unless you were trying to support games in general, then yes.

[ElFipso]

Re: I choose quality of game play over graphics.

That's a redundant argument, the same can be said for any game...
Unless you were trying to support games in general, then yes.

I always say:
It's not the game that is bad - it's the players who spoil the fun.
BF2 has many was to be played.
So if you spam nades at Karkand Hotel all the time it gets boring very fast and repetitive.
But if you actually try to flank the Hotel and cap a flag you change things.
You have so many classes to play, so many vehicles to use. You can squad up or go lone wolf, go rambo or just relax sniping.

What I mean: it lies in the gamers hands to make the game enjoyable and not repetitive or boring.

I used to play IO alot and it was getting boring so I switched to vehicle servers and now I enjoy jets (even though I'm not good at it). Yesterday I played a round IO and it was great again.
And that's it: Just use all the possibilities BF2 offers and you won't get bored that easily.


FipZ

[AllFoamNoBeer]

Re: I choose quality of game play over graphics.

Once again, you are right, it doesn't lie in the game, it's the players.

But then again, there are always the 63/64 people on the damned Karkand map that don't want to listen to you, or their own team. It's vain, applies to any game.

[ElFipso]

Re: I choose quality of game play over graphics.

haha, true.
A good way to have a better play is to NOT play Karkand ;-)

I have good fun lately playing the EU maps