bf2 Vs bf 2142

[messfeeder]

Re: bf2 Vs bf 2142

You can bind parachute and jump to the same key, it's on BF2S.

link?

[Wizrdwarts]

Re: bf2 Vs bf 2142

http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=45491

9th post down.

[Stev0esque]

Re: bf2 Vs bf 2142

wow while ive said why cant bf2ers and 2142ers just get along for once everyone is arguing on this one :shock:

[imported_Field]

Re: bf2 Vs bf 2142

im simply more inclined to play bf2142. i think both games take skill to play but i just think compared to 2142 BF2 looks kind of stupid like with character animations and stuff and then of course the weak weak audio

[Jaswahhihi]

Re: bf2 Vs bf 2142

2142 is far far better for squadplay. (squad beacon for example)
Its the only reason I dont play BF2.

[WolfAlmighty]

Re: bf2 Vs bf 2142

The only vehicals overpowered in BF2 are the jets as the only effective counter to a jet is another jet. Tanks are childs play to kill 2 hits to the tracks and there dead and an APC can be hit pretty much anywere twice and die.

I sense wisdom in this one. Yes, the force is strong within him. :salute:

As someone who routinely bounces back and forth between the two games at any given interval, I will say what makes each game better than the other.

BF2 is better because:

1) Vehicles are more fun and diverse.
2) Maps have more variety in colour. There's swamp, desert, jungle/forest, city, and island.
3) MEC UAV lady sounds sexy.
4) AK-101
5) No APC that will be able to drive faster than any armoured vehicle, be able to completely lockdown an armoured vehicle, be able to kill infantry easier than any other vehicle, and takes more to kill than a tank. (Can you tell I dislike the APC in BF2142? ).
6) Unlock system that doesn't make you worthless if you're new to the game.
7) Mines don't chase your vehicle.

BF2142 is better because:

1) Aircraft are not nigh-impossible to deal with without being in another aircraft.
2) Crouch isn't worthless in infantry fights.
3) APMs (claymores) can be bypassed using crouch or prone.
4) (Personal preference) Stats are more detailed and informative, and awards are more fun to play for since they're worth something, plus being able to get multiple pins always gives you incentives.
5) Baur H-AR
6) Orbital strikes are more effective against vehicles than BF2 arty, and less effective against infantry.
7) No insta-heal or insta-full ammo magic bags.

~Wolfgang

[fatmooseknuckle]

Re: bf2 Vs bf 2142

bf2 takes the lead out of the gate, but for the 2142 wins the race. in bf2 you have everything unlocked except your guns...big deal. so ranking isn't nearly as important. you can run, use c4 & grenades from day 1. in 2142 you have to unlock the simplest of abilities & items such as grenades, better medic kits & repair tools.. the kits have a more robust choice of options. when it comes to healing, you actually have to let the healing process take place. in bf2, you run over a medic kit w/ only 1 hit point & all of sudden you're back at full strength..BAH! squad play is much improved w/ the ability to get points from following orders. in bf2 you just kill, get kill assists & heal/revive/repair/resupply. while bf2 may be more "popular" in terms of players, 2142 has proven to be the more superior of the two.

[Minmaster]

Re: bf2 Vs bf 2142

i agree with the bf2 guys with one thing: the grossly spammish overpowered PK-rockets.

[Juggalo11046]

Re: bf2 Vs bf 2142

i agree with the bf2 guys with one thing: the grossly spammish overpowered PK-rockets.

What about the grossly overpowered APC motar.

[Minmaster]

Re: bf2 Vs bf 2142

What about the grossly overpowered APC motar.

ok that too... but berlin would be so boring without it. :laugh:

[Stev0esque]

Re: bf2 Vs bf 2142

Oh, when will the fighting stop??? dont you people read the thread that this discussion was supposed to be in? I said that why cant both sides just settle on the fact that battlefield will never die no matter how many games claim to kill it then fail (like ffow) come on people!!! we need peace or to seperate the bf2 and 2142 forums again or there will be pointless arguments like this forever. :cry:

[Juggalo11046]

Re: bf2 Vs bf 2142

ok that too... but berlin would be so boring without it. :laugh:

Yea, after spawning PAC with a sniper and getting mortared 15 times in a row. I normally gamer rage on my keyboard and pull out the pilum.:laugh:

[Minmaster]

Re: bf2 Vs bf 2142

Yea, after spawning PAC with a sniper and getting mortared 15 times in a row. I normally gamer rage on my keyboard and pull out the pilum.:laugh:

typical berlin round:

50: 50-0-0 (the driver)
50: 0-50-0 (the mortar man)

i hate it when i jump into the APC and there's some bum waiting in the F2 seat.

[vanilla]

Re: bf2 Vs bf 2142

Driver would have 25, no? Cause kill assists only count as 0.5 as far as I know.

[serevalassassin]

Re: bf2 Vs bf 2142

cbf reading thread.

2142 scirms> bf2 scrims, 2142 pubs < Bf2 pubs

This doesn't work if you play in a fail 2142 comp that allows more then t2 unlocks. Certainly counts if you have t0 unlocks keke.

*insert random differences between the games*

- Shields. They add an extra dimension to Armour battles. I love to see the best walker pilots in aus come up 1v1 come scrim time. (martini and anthrax mainly)

- Walkers provide great battles with the way they fire, rather then shoot as soon as the gun is ready like on tanks.

- Nades are thrown far slower so you can't just whip them out quickly like in bf2

- less nades but only just

- 2142 long rage rifle battles are better, but it's debatable which one is funner in close combat. Bf2 isn't just insta prone like the noobs think.

- 2142 rego wins

- rockets ruin game, far gayer then GL in bf2

- longer vehicle spawns

I know there's far more for me to post but cbf tonight.