jets are just so unrealistic

[Chris_Redfield]

i'm not showing off ****. it's just so you know i know a bit about what i'm talking about. you kids think you know a lot about guns because you play video games. so it's not a simulator yet it copies gun models to the finest detail?

KTHXPIE.

YOU PHAIL

The only one whos failing here is you.

BF2 has never, ever been advertised as a combat simulator. In fact, the community has always known that BF2 represents the downscaled arcadeish distorted version of a battlefield. The realism argument does pop up from time to time, and everyone who has tried to play a smartass (ie people like you), have always been laughed at and slapped for being completely stupid.

And how does the game copy the guns to the finest details, if many of the weapons arent functioning the way they are functioning in real life. Like damage, rate of fire, recoil, effective range, iron sights range. Most notably, the SRAW missile. Im not even going into defibrillators, even though I have seen them in use and I would be able to operate them. You dont see me b!tching.

And a big fat "LOL" at the "kids" comment. I can name at least one person off these forums, who at least has flown a plane, and whom I dont remember ever complaining about the contradictions with reality in air aspect. Ive flown a Cessna 172 myself and attended flight school for a year.

Needless to say. Pack your bags and go masturbate or something, youre wasting everyones time.

[quentinlau]

If you don't like it, don't play it then, or go play the mods you think they've done jets right.

Real war is not supposed to be fun.

[[MIA] crimsonand]

Needless to say. Pack your bags and go masturbate or something, youre wasting everyones time.

That just about the best post i have ever read!

[cupcake]

not as funny as your signature link... lol learn to hide referalz links.

phaillszz

[Mo0by]

I can't belive your 22.

[Kodakk]

Chris, you make crappy arguments, filled with unnecessary insults.

He IS right - despite his attitude. He was trying to support his argument by offering up the fact that he has a license related somewhat to avionics.

The jets here, do suck, I admit. The free look is horrible, the physics are God-awful, The way the missiles function is completely fictional, the lack of radar is worse, and the countermeasures are beyond unrealistic.

That is why there is Lock On. Yes, it's not the most popular game, but it offers you what you need. I hope there will be a day when a game will come out - similar to ArmA - where everything is closer to reality (without a mod - shush PR ).

However, to make jets completely realistic, you need HUGE maps. So, it's already out of the question

*I agree Mooby...

[waaah_wah]

^^Amen

[AmericanDad]

close the thread I say it's useless

[Chris_Redfield]

Chris, you make crappy arguments, filled with unnecessary insults.

Stop. We know why you posted this, no need to go any further.

He IS right - despite his attitude. He was trying to support his argument by offering up the fact that he has a license related somewhat to avionics.

Actually he isnt right. The fact, that he has a slight idea of how a multidozen million fighter jet operates, has little to no impact on the simple fact that BF2 is a simplified arcade battle game. Nothing more, nothing less. Stating your opinion as a fact, a´la "jet aspect sucks because its not realistic" only means youre basically a moron who is, after 2.5 years, still unable to understand that BF2 was never meant to be "realistic".

Quite simply, youre saying that hazelnut chocolate sucks (as a fact), because you dislike chocolate, and youve got a certificate to prove that youve been working in McDonalds and therefore you stating your opinion as a fact has any reasonable weight.

You sir, make crappy arguments, even moreso when you support that Jacko.

The jets here, do suck, I admit. The free look is horrible, the physics are God-awful, The way the missiles function is completely fictional, the lack of radar is worse, and the countermeasures are beyond unrealistic.

100% opinion stated as a fact. I happen to like the free look, I also love, that you get no blackouts, which means you can concentrate on pure fun of the art, missiles are simple and to the point - "lock on and fire". The lack of radar has not disturbed anyone but you yourself and the countermeasures are simply a way to balance out autoaiming missiles.

No. BF2 air aspect doesnt suck because it just happens to not to be a sim.

That is why there is Lock On. Yes, it's not the most popular game, but it offers you what you need. I hope there will be a day when a game will come out - similar to ArmA - where everything is closer to reality (without a mod - shush PR ).

People dont need that sh!t. You realism monkeys always forget, that the vast majority of us dont want to go through a 700 page manual just to fly a virtual airplane. Hell, somehow I doubt you yourself actually read any books.

However, to make jets completely realistic, you need HUGE maps. So, it's already out of the question

It was out of the question before you and your buddy came along, crying about the lack of realism in a fictional, arcade, light shooter. My god...

[camper.]

Chris Redfield, a-****ing-men.

Just by looking at the first post, all I note is that some 60% of his argument is "I have a glider's license and I've played IL2 Sturmovik".

In fact, looking again, there is ZERO content to that post that is actually about BF2.

[Chris_Redfield]

Man, this seal is hot. Im so stealing this.

[camper.]

That is the perfect face behind it, considering he failed at every opportunity he had in his life, most funded by Daddy Bush. If Failtopia was a sovereign state, George Bush's face would be on their dollar.

[proto]

I <3 Chris. You should have a slogan or something...

The point here is...BF2 was never meant to be realistic. So complaining that ANY aspect of the game is unrealistic holds absolutely no weight.

Simple, to the point, and gtfo.

[Chris_Redfield]

I dont know really. Considering all of this epic fail, I cant help but think that hes still the president of the US of A. So theres definitely more than meets the eye. The media doesnt help either. I swear, if there was a cameraman behind my every move, youd "lol" at how clumsy I can be.

[proto]

I'd seriously like to understand where all you Bush haters get your 'facts'. Bush can't wipe his *** without 15 people telling him he can...no president can.

P.S. Exaggeration, btw