Originally posted by nemesis908
View Post
StarCraft is a good game, but it's also extremely overhyped. That's not to say that your point about Command and Conquer is untrue. However the only Command and Conquer game i can think of as being overhyped is Generals; which also happens to be the worst incarnation of the series.
StarCraft is played by 400´000 players (thats pretty much at any given time), WarCraft is played by 75´000 players. Now, these games dont offer persistency, and world has seen a lot of new games come out, so the competition is definitely out there. I dont see people playing a "****ty" game, unless theres a twist to it. And saying a game is "overhyped" is basically saying the game is "lackluster" in certain department. When you respond to me, which you will, please explain how the games are overhyped and where are they lacking.
I, personally, when I played RA2, Generals and Tiberium Wars, couldnt help but think how little has changed since I first played Red Alert, 8 years ago. Apart from graphical upgrades, the games setup has changed little. And its cool if it works for CnCc fans. But playing StarCraft immediately shows the difference in the depth of gameplay. StarCraft is not that popular because its "hyped", StarCraft is popular because it delivers. Its hopelessly outdated in visual aspects though.
Id also like for you to explain how is it that StarCraft took the most popular game votes in WCG website, leading at 40%?
Warcraft 3 is mediocre at best. One of the biggest reasons it's done so well is that it's overhyped. It's overhyped because it's made by Blizzard, and the fact that it's followed by hordes of overzealous fans who think Blizzard can do no wrong simply because they made StarCraft/WarCraft.
However, I cant see "hype" to be of any blame, especially when we see factual examples of games failing because they were "overhyped". Is SC and WC3 failing?
It's like World of Warcraft.
WoW is a piss poor game, and there are/were plenty of other MMOs out there created to a higher quality than it, yet it exceeds them in terms of popularity. It's also popular because it has RTS fans of WarCraft/StarCraft on the back of it.
If gamers had realised that it wasn't as good as the hype, it doesnt mean that there would be a decline in it's popularity. Especially if they have friends who also play or they are unaware of any alternatives. WoW was the first MMO experience for a lot of players.
So no, popularity doesnt necessarily mean a game's good. It's an overstatement to compare the RTS market to the FPS market as equal, since the FPS market is much bigger.
I already put StarCraft in the list as "a game worth looking at". StarCraft is given this "legendary" status for god knows what reason, because there were better games out around that time.
It's probably due mostly to people wearing extra thick nostalgia goggles.
Easy there, just accept that some games work, and that if youre comparing one game to anyother, your emotions have a big say in the final result.
Originally posted by L3adCannon
View Post
Again, as an SP experience, theres little to hate. I do admit that Perseus Mandate felt dragged at certain parts.
Comment