Flash, Stun or Smoke?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Maxor127
    Member
    • Oct 2006
    • 314

    #16
    Flash usually unless I'm either a sniper or if I wanted to kill a sniper, then I'd use smoke.

    Comment

    • CptainCrunch
      I am the 1%
      • Oct 2007
      • 12976

      #17
      I dont know what it is, but smoke freaks people out. Stun is good and I really like the flash, but smoke tends to make people stop and wonder whats going on.

      Crunch
      Twitter: @CptainCrunch
      Battlelog/Origin: CptainCrunch

      Comment

      • Yukiism
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2006
        • 1578

        #18
        Yeah, people really think is dangerous, because they think some sniper is waiting for them on the other side of the smoke screen.
        And i can't blame them, i'm doing it myself.

        I voted for Flash, but i learned to love Stun more! :yay: That Hit Detection signal is the way to go.

        Comment

        • imported_Whiskey
          Member
          • May 2007
          • 3325

          #19
          Up to now, I've used Stun...but I'm finding as I play more that I'm more defenseless when someone uses a Flash nade on me. Going prone can save your bacon sometimes if you're in the grass and have UAV jammer, but quite often I come out of it dead. I think I'll have to start trying Flash myself more, especially in games like HQ when storming a building.

          Comment

          Working...