Does BF2 Lack Something?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • imported_Chael
    Member
    • Mar 2006
    • 602

    #46
    Re: Does BF2 Lack Something?

    Originally posted by Drifterboy View Post
    umm the heli is stronger than the jet cause 1 AT missile kills a jet and 2-3 kill a heli
    I think he means weak in terms of evasion, not armor.

    Comment

    • TheBornGGG

      #47
      Re: Does BF2 Lack Something?

      Originally posted by Anni-kin View Post
      BF2 lacks regular good updates and also (ive been told this is in 2142) i think when u get awards u should get points towards ur ranks as bonus - depending on the type of award.
      I agree with that. It would help a lot of players.

      Comment

      • Chevy-SS
        Member
        • Jun 2005
        • 165

        #48
        Re: Does BF2 Lack Something?

        BF2 is a game, and for a game it does a damm fine job.

        My only complaint is air power (jets mainly) is too powerful. Give me a fair number of potent AA guns and missiles, and this game would be about as good as it can get IMO.


        -

        Comment

        • Metal Knight

          #49
          Re: Does BF2 Lack Something?

          yeah i think AA could stand to be improved, but i agree with all else said, i think its a great game in its own right.

          Comment

          • dremanu

            #50
            Re: Does BF2 Lack Something?

            Three things I would change:

            1) No commandar scan of the battlefield. UAV is OK, but the scan is just freakin unrealistic.

            2) Artillery would have to behave just like another gun. Someone would have to actually operate the gun, load it, aim it, and shoot it. Not the way it's in the game right now.

            3) Gorund-to-Air missiles that lock, and stay locked, and destroy helis. Helis are by far the most overpowered weapon in the all game.

            Comment

            • Chevy-SS
              Member
              • Jun 2005
              • 165

              #51
              Re: Does BF2 Lack Something?

              RE: "Three things I would change"

              #1 - IMO the scan is not all that unrealistic. We already got all kinds of satellites and UAV's and IR and night-vision, etc, etc........

              #2 - Impossible to operate as you state. It would take half the players in the game to work the arty.......

              #3 - Helis are OK. Yeah, they are powerful, but you can knock them down with machine guns fairly easily.

              Comment

              • eddyeddyd

                #52
                Re: Does BF2 Lack Something?

                speaking of knocking thing out with a michine gun...its surprisingyly easy to soot down the enemy UAV with a vehicle 50cal.

                the scan needs to go because although we have scans in real life....they dont auto differenciate between friendlies,civlians and hostiles.

                Comment

                • Metal Knight

                  #53
                  Re: Does BF2 Lack Something?

                  Originally posted by eddyeddyd View Post
                  the scan needs to go because although we have scans in real life....they dont auto differenciate between friendlies,civlians and hostiles.
                  you are right about the non-auto diff. However:

                  we have people monitoring the scans in "home base"/"MoD" or whatever its called so they act as effective "auto-diffrenciators" ie. we have people whose job is to monitor the scans and give feedback to commander =)

                  Comment

                  Working...