Armor rating of classes?

[imported_Neptune]

Re: Armor rating of classes?

they should have made it more complex though. Its too one dimensional, u have armor or not, full sprint or low sprint. There should be different ratings example: spec ops should run faster and longer, and maybe support the slowest and laziest.

[Iron_Weasel]

Re: Armor rating of classes?

they should have made it more complex though. Its too one dimensional, u have armor or not, full sprint or low sprint. There should be different ratings example: spec ops should run faster and longer, and maybe support the slowest and laziest.

I agree with that one an propose that if there were such a change to the game on this subject, the order from fastest/longest to slowest/shortest be as such:

Sniper
Spec Ops
Medic
Engineer
Assault
Support
Anti-Tank

Sniper should have the longest sprint and fastest run speed due to the relatively small amount of weaponry that is carried.
Spec Ops runs slightly slower and not as far with the addition of the C4.
Third is the medic since he carries the defibrillator and other medical gear. Fourth is the engineer because of the anti-vehicle mines.
Assault goes in the 5th slot as armor is added to this class and more ammunition weaponry being carried.
Support resides in 6th as a result of the machine gun and the "infinite" ammunition supply.
Finally, we have the anti-tank kit which should be the most lethargic class simply because of the sheer weight of the anti-tank rounds and the launcher.

[ham_411]

Re: Armor rating of classes?

Assault goes in the 5th slot as armor is added to this class and more ammunition weaponry being carried.

and where would he be placed when equiped with the G3????

[TotalBF2er]

Re: Armor rating of classes?

The fact is, you can't really tell the difference between an armored class and not... I think there are many other factors at play than armor. Who needs armor if you have a hyper-accurate weapon, or who wants armor when your assault gun can't hit anything?