how come?

[Sniper1432]

*do u guys get lower fps in armored fury and euroforce compared to the regular bf2 maps?? my FPS drop into the 40's in euroforce compared to karkand where i get 75 constant

[Ramirez]

Re: how come?

I don't have AF. And just started playing BF2!

But in CSS, my FPS varied from map to map, i.e. de_dust has 40-70, but then cs_italy has like 60-120.

So yeah, I think it differs.

[|CBW|Simon]

Re: how come?

Certain maps and spots have a larger weight put on your graphics processor. I haven't noticed EF or AF being as bad as some spots in Special Forces. Maybe you can empty your graphics cache and let it re-optimize. May clear things up for you.

Simon

[megawhompertoo]

Re: how come?

with SF there are more accessible areas that must be loaded into memory, with the commensurate drop in fps due to having more surfaces rendered in detail; i imagine on maps like great wall the same thing applies.

example--it is far less taxing to render a "box building" (hotel karkand) than is inacessible than it is to render an accessible building (inside the great wall/on top of structures in SF) due to the increased textures.