Patch 1.40 MD5 Checksums

[Copy_of_Blah]

Re: Patch 1.40 MD5 Checksums

Here is the results I got from Beta to Patch 1.40.

Might want to sit down.



ERROR: MD5 sum does not match for C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\AIDLL_w32ded.dll. Expected: bae3fcef66009098592d947eec710d46 Calculated: 15d1688b0477033fd5549bd5579f151e
ERROR: MD5 sum does not match for C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Levels\Road_To_Jalalabad\archive.md5. Expected: e58a60c794d6dca2f2febbe2e6b32e90 Calculated: 80f2f130f1fefa9fbd11196b7469e98a
ERROR: MD5 sum does not match for C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Levels\Road_To_Jalalabad\client.zip. Expected: ba804a1b799771e10c8f055af73aa35a Calculated: bd10ffaf90e8ed3c9b55c50eb1704996
ERROR: MD5 sum does not match for C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Levels\Road_To_Jalalabad\Info\favoriteM ap.png. Expected: dda714cf4dc1f9c888dfc8ebcc2a3518 Calculated: 8902bb4238e8b3feb492f41a163e7c02
ERROR: MD5 sum does not match for C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Levels\Road_To_Jalalabad\server.zip. Expected: cbebc72bcd0343225282405689fe152e Calculated: 6603c2beb7a1002b7ea6a656da7dcfd2
ERROR: MD5 sum does not match for C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\chinese\Chinese_Mappacks.u txt. Expected: 6484a8d549eb144db9157b5d2146e9f8 Calculated: 26299555f541811e8c93048359eb6857
ERROR: MD5 sum does not match for C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\dutch\Dutch_Mappacks.utxt. Expected: ca62ca1f47e404a22f138276af1b80ad Calculated: 82dcd6813ff34e307984c35af67a02cb
ERROR: MD5 sum does not match for C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\french\French_Mappacks.utx t. Expected: 833b031583a59dceb7e62165bcfcc2d7 Calculated: 16434e90218a8b2c2aae22b7cc17e642
ERROR: MD5 sum does not match for C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\german\German_Mappacks.utx t. Expected: 6b516a41bbc992524fe309a01d6a4718 Calculated: 6b98f0c466004a013063fe03ee1ba13d
ERROR: MD5 sum does not match for C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\italian\Italian_Mappacks.u txt. Expected: 44fb76847170d56e0d4c0c71051d5df0 Calculated: 444717696e03308559dd02e669f79dd1
ERROR: MD5 sum does not match for C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\japanese\Japanese_Mappacks .utxt. Expected: 0e405c6ff0fe57e50ec6c1c7eaa03ad1 Calculated: 6f0d69479e1cc4a08b91d2e16021c6eb
ERROR: MD5 sum does not match for C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\korean\Korean_Mappacks.utx t. Expected: da1e81bd68451a12887d86df2c6930bd Calculated: 58d09fd0cd326ef5c0e2f6ca1059e226
ERROR: MD5 sum does not match for C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\polish\Polish_Mappacks.utx t. Expected: 5c193cf86b601e4a77c2d3ff14fe4a69 Calculated: 512990442a378b68ae75d2e826fd979d
ERROR: MD5 sum does not match for C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\spanish\Spanish_Mappacks.u txt. Expected: 352f49498fb93c1b512da2d05c1c509c Calculated: d5ea8f21b46355612c0cfa2edf78efde
ERROR: MD5 sum does not match for C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\swedish\Swedish_Mappacks.u txt. Expected: dd6cdb1ae26e0e2848b158f4c9e2efe5 Calculated: 922f89062dd5f8f5f70a0645415a7111
ERROR: MD5 sum does not match for C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\thai\Thai_Mappacks.utxt. Expected: 79aec8545704b86758b7ee9dcfcce1f4 Calculated: 29c631025b7c779c8d1f9d3bc6f42010
ERROR: MD5 sum does not match for C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\std_archive_mod.md5. Expected: 3ef4bddd36b8e922d205c94543c25dbd Calculated: 08cb82550239af641fad8c8c6ecb3020
ERROR: MD5 sum does not match for C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\PATCH.ERR. Expected: 58d7ff86fd3319d816580769b16d05e9 Calculated: 30cc8733cc9baa78f5880b2a70f5468a
ERROR: MD5 sum does not match for C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\RendDX9.dll. Expected: 8a7e82be225f251dcbd82a2a92644486 Calculated: ebdb5aeee68e4445a4c69beb3b835627

*** The following files failed matching test:
C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\AIDLL_w32ded.dll
C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\bf2Patch.log
C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Levels\Road_To_Jalalabad\archive.md5
C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Levels\Road_To_Jalalabad\client.zip
C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Levels\Road_To_Jalalabad\Info\favoriteM ap.png
C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Levels\Road_To_Jalalabad\Info\loadmap.p ng
C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Levels\Road_To_Jalalabad\server.zip
C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\chinese\Chinese_Mappacks.u txt
C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\dutch\Dutch_Mappacks.utxt
C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\french\French_Mappacks.utx t
C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\german\German_Mappacks.utx t
C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\italian\Italian_Mappacks.u txt
C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\japanese\Japanese_Mappacks .utxt
C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\korean\Korean_Mappacks.utx t
C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\polish\Polish_Mappacks.utx t
C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\spanish\Spanish_Mappacks.u txt
C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\swedish\Swedish_Mappacks.u txt
C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\Localization\thai\Thai_Mappacks.utxt
C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\mods\bf2\std_archive_mod.md5
C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\PATCH.ERR
C:\Program Files\EA GAMES\Battlefield 2\RendDX9.dll


It seems that all this waiting was for the map alone. I don't blame anyone who wants to go into denial atm.


I did find several errors in the official PATCH.ERR log file. I noticed that if the file wasn't found but something was found with the same name nothing changed.That doesn't sit right with me. An overwrite of all those files makes more sense wouldn't it.


Anyway feel free to flame.

[poisonsoul]

Re: Patch 1.40 MD5 Checksums

I use Nero's MD5 Hash Checker:

http://ww2.nero.com/nero7/eng/Nero_MD5_Verifier.html

Type your supposed hash and select your file and it tests it and gives a simple answer.

[Cigar_Man]

Re: Patch 1.40 MD5 Checksums

Here is the results I got from Beta to Patch 1.40.

Might want to sit down.

<snipped>

It seems that all this waiting was for the map alone. I don't blame anyone who wants to go into denial atm.

I did find several errors in the official PATCH.ERR log file. I noticed that if the file wasn't found but something was found with the same name nothing changed.That doesn't sit right with me. An overwrite of all those files makes more sense wouldn't it.

Anyway feel free to flame.

What are you comparing here?

If you installed the final 1.4 patch over the 1.4 beta, then that is the problem. You cannot do this.

My patch log is a lot different, with no md5 errors at all.

[KristianSax]

Re: Patch 1.40 MD5 Checksums

What are you comparing here?

If you installed the final 1.4 patch over the 1.4 beta, then that is the problem. You cannot do this.

My patch log is a lot different, with no md5 errors at all.

Wasn't that even pointed out in the beta warning that also told ppl to make a copy of the vanilla folder?

[Cigar_Man]

Re: Patch 1.40 MD5 Checksums

I use Nero's MD5 Hash Checker:

http://ww2.nero.com/nero7/eng/Nero_MD5_Verifier.html

Type your supposed hash and select your file and it tests it and gives a simple answer.

I use winMd5Sum from nullriver for single file checks.

Wasn't that even pointed out in the beta warning that also told ppl to make a copy of the vanilla folder?

Yes it was. I even used that info to backup my 1.3 files before adding the 1.4 full patch just in case there was a problem. No problem for me though.

[Copy_of_Blah]

Re: Patch 1.40 MD5 Checksums

Basically I was doing a diff from 1.4 beta to 1.4 . Why wouldn't/shouldn't/couldn't I overwrite 1.4 beta with 1.4 final then check md5s to compare the differences??

Oh well, I'll do it the long way then:
1) Install fresh. (and make two backups)
2) Install 1.3 full and make a checkfile on folder.
3) Rename 1.3 to something and rename backup.
4) Install 1.4 beta and make a checkfile on folder.
5) Rename 1.4 beta and rename second backup.
6) Install 1.4 Final and make a checkfile on folder.
7) Finally run a diff to check files.

I have a feeling it's gonna turn out with the same results though.

P.S. You should have errors between a checkfile of 1.4 beta and 1.4 final. They are supposed to be different! That's kind of the point.

What I'm trying to get at is that from 14-Jul-2006 to now nothing much has changed aside from the new map.
My new results might show something else. I'll see.

[Cigar_Man]

Re: Patch 1.40 MD5 Checksums

Basically I was doing a diff from 1.4 beta to 1.4 . Why wouldn't/shouldn't/couldn't I overwrite 1.4 beta with 1.4 final then check md5s to compare the differences??

Oh well, I'll do it the long way then:
1) Install fresh. (and make two backups)
2) Install 1.3 full and make a checkfile on folder.
3) Rename 1.3 to something and rename backup.
4) Install 1.4 beta and make a checkfile on folder.
5) Rename 1.4 beta and rename second backup.
6) Install 1.4 Final and make a checkfile on folder.
7) Finally run a diff to check files.

I have a feeling it's gonna turn out with the same results though.

P.S. You should have errors between a checkfile of 1.4 beta and 1.4 final. They are supposed to be different! That's kind of the point.

What I'm trying to get at is that from 14-Jul-2006 to now nothing much has changed aside from the new map.
My new results might show something else. I'll see.

OK I see what you are doing but that is not what the OP posted about. He just wanted to know about the patch md5sums and not what is changed with the patch. You just went a whole different direction with your post, which really is not needed in this series. You may want to start a new post with your info if you feel the need.

[Copy_of_Blah]

Re: Patch 1.40 MD5 Checksums

What should the title be "53 days of deceit"?

[bulzenschneider]

Re: Patch 1.40 MD5 Checksums

What should the title be "53 days of deceit"?

I suggest: I waste my time with md5 checksum comparisons plus double backing up everything instead of listening to installation / deinstallation instructions.

[imported_BlueScreen]

Re: Patch 1.40 MD5 Checksums

Nah - just post it here if you like. I would be interested myself if the only changes since the last beta version are in this jalajala map (remember the: 'we discovered a severe bug, therefore the release will be delayed' - severe bug on jalajala or what :laugh.

On a side note: only 3! people were able to post their MD5 sums, now you can make an educated guess of the reading abilities of the average forum visitor here :hmm: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

[bulzenschneider]

Re: Patch 1.40 MD5 Checksums

On a side note: only 3! people were able to post their MD5 sums, now you can make an educated guess of the reading abilities of the average forum visitor here :hmm: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

omg how clever you are :laugh:
I don't give a **** about those gayish md5 checksums cause my patch is already running without any problems at all. Rofl

[Cigar_Man]

Re: Patch 1.40 MD5 Checksums

omg how clever you are :laugh:
I don't give a **** about those gayish md5 checksums cause my patch is already running without any problems at all. Rofl

I never run any executable if I cannot verify checksums to the file. Viruses, rootkits, and worse can be in any executable. I learned that back in 1987 the first time one of my servers was corrupted by a bad file.

[bulzenschneider]

Re: Patch 1.40 MD5 Checksums

I never run any executable if I cannot verify checksums to the file. Viruses, rootkits, and worse can be in any executable. I learned that back in 1987 the first time one of my servers was corrupted by a bad file.

I accept that there's sense behind that routine, but I'm just too lazy to do such things. However, he was clearly showing off, that smartass :laugh:

[imported_BlueScreen]

Re: Patch 1.40 MD5 Checksums

I accept that there's sense behind that routine, but I'm just too lazy to do such things. However, he was clearly showing off, that smartass :laugh:

Dude, i was showing nothing. I simply said that there are only 3 usefull answers while the rest was useless spam - like your posts - either intentionally or unintentionally not related the slightest bit to my original question.

The only exception was Copy_of_Blah by comparing the latest beta with the final - which seems to be quite a laugh if he's right.

[bulzenschneider]

Re: Patch 1.40 MD5 Checksums

Dude, i was showing nothing. I simply said that there are only 3 usefull answers while the rest was useless spam - like your posts - either intentionally or unintentionally not related the slightest bit to my original question.

The only exception was Copy_of_Blah by comparing the latest beta with the final - which seems to be quite a laugh if he's right.

Well, I sensed a lot of arrogance in your post.
Maybe I got something wrong. I beg your pardon.