Re: Final and Easiest Fix for J10 - F35 Imbalance
Not going to get to every point, I will admit you corrected me on certain points.
Though, If speaking about mec vs US, then you also should add the Remington to this CQC-discussion, cause in SaK M11 really rocks even better then AK-101. I didnt say the AK-101 didnt rock. It is an advantage to get one shot kills. But at distance, the M16 has its advantage compared to the AK. Agree that in CQC like the front of SaK, that it is far more easy to take down a squad with the AK then with the M16A1. On Wake, the M16 will IMO be better then AK-47 .
Still, comparing BF2 and its weapons on clanmatches are maybe not fair. Though, mec often meets M16 with PP-19, which is as you say, ends in win for mec. I dont know why, but I dont think US has any disadvantages except for 4on4.
I would too prefer the T-90 before the Abrams. Though, the Type-98 is the worst tank IMO. As for maps with hardware, like on 32- and 64-slotservers, then the Abrams have the advantage of firing against choppers, which the Type-98 cant.
After the Abrams didnt get damaged of moving outside of roads, then it really became inproved. T-90 is still har to hit, but the larger size of the Abrams, does not add many sweet-spots to hit. Tracks ara quite similar on both tanks.
My bad on the missiles there.
About the M24, they have a longer viewdistance, and in sniperwars, there are one shot one kill.
Originally posted by Wasp
I will just point to metallicaguitrst's reply on this one.
I've played up to 4 matches a week on all maps. I would take any tank over
the Abrahams.
I'm shure I dont..
Still I've had no problem taking it down in every clan match on Clean Sweep.
AK-101 uses 5.56 NATO ammunition. You can check that for yourself:
I've had no problems getting headshots with the AK at range. It also kills in
1 shot which the M16 doesn't. The full auto on the AK works well in close and
medium combat. I don't even have to use the iron sight while prone.
According to the stats I have the M249 and the RPK have the same accuracy
but more deviation is added to the M249 than the RPK per shot.
They have the exact same data but the AK does more damage.
Having played some inf wars on Karkand against other clans it's amusing to
see that the US team loose the rounds and when the teams switch the
clan that lost with US wins MEC. So it ends up as who wins the most on MEC.
Being a smarta$$ get's you nowhere..
Edit: Damnit Chris! :laugh:
I've played up to 4 matches a week on all maps. I would take any tank over
the Abrahams.
I'm shure I dont..
Still I've had no problem taking it down in every clan match on Clean Sweep.
AK-101 uses 5.56 NATO ammunition. You can check that for yourself:
I've had no problems getting headshots with the AK at range. It also kills in
1 shot which the M16 doesn't. The full auto on the AK works well in close and
medium combat. I don't even have to use the iron sight while prone.
According to the stats I have the M249 and the RPK have the same accuracy
but more deviation is added to the M249 than the RPK per shot.
They have the exact same data but the AK does more damage.
Having played some inf wars on Karkand against other clans it's amusing to
see that the US team loose the rounds and when the teams switch the
clan that lost with US wins MEC. So it ends up as who wins the most on MEC.
Being a smarta$$ get's you nowhere..
Edit: Damnit Chris! :laugh:
Though, If speaking about mec vs US, then you also should add the Remington to this CQC-discussion, cause in SaK M11 really rocks even better then AK-101. I didnt say the AK-101 didnt rock. It is an advantage to get one shot kills. But at distance, the M16 has its advantage compared to the AK. Agree that in CQC like the front of SaK, that it is far more easy to take down a squad with the AK then with the M16A1. On Wake, the M16 will IMO be better then AK-47 .
Still, comparing BF2 and its weapons on clanmatches are maybe not fair. Though, mec often meets M16 with PP-19, which is as you say, ends in win for mec. I dont know why, but I dont think US has any disadvantages except for 4on4.
I would too prefer the T-90 before the Abrams. Though, the Type-98 is the worst tank IMO. As for maps with hardware, like on 32- and 64-slotservers, then the Abrams have the advantage of firing against choppers, which the Type-98 cant.
After the Abrams didnt get damaged of moving outside of roads, then it really became inproved. T-90 is still har to hit, but the larger size of the Abrams, does not add many sweet-spots to hit. Tracks ara quite similar on both tanks.
Originally posted by Chris_Redfield
About the M24, they have a longer viewdistance, and in sniperwars, there are one shot one kill.
Comment