Server breaking BFRoE

[BlueBunny63]

Re: Server breaking BFRoE

I admire your attempt to hang onto the dream of what the points/rank system was supposed to be, but come out of it and see it for what it is, a complete shambles.

Agreed. The existence of servers (Pistol/Knife, High Points) that are ranked and operating in direction contravention to the ROE says that EA is vastly more interested in the revenue generated by server rentals, than in actually ensuring that the servers are offering EA's customers a level playing field, with consistent rules and even-handed enforcement.

When it comes to ranked servers, it really is "all about the money", and so long as the credit card comes back approved, EA doesn't seriously care what the server "owner" does with his private Idaho.

[|D|-Max]

Re: Server breaking BFRoE

I dont see the problem, the server owner wants a practice in his own server with his clan mates, i'd respect that and leave after that map had finished.

me to nothing wrong

[WarGimp]

Re: Server breaking BFRoE

me to nothing wrong

Allow me to attempt to explain this in a way everyone can understand.

The argument "It's their server so they can do what they like" is flat out wrong.

First off, it's not their server. It's their lisenced server. It doesn't belong to them, they don't rent is, they don't lease it. They lisence it. There's a big difference between those concepts. Under a lisenced agreement, all rights remain with the actual owner (EA) and the lisencee (in this case the NATO clan) is bound by the rules as laid out by the lisence (the ROE).

The ROE clearly stipulates that you cannot kick people out of ranked servers without just cause. This means they violated the lisence and can be spanked for it (they could lose their lisence, for example).

If they wanted to have a clan practice all they had to do is to password protect the server and it would become unranked. There would be no violation in this case since the ROE only applies to ranked servers.

Moreover, there is no reason not to have practices on a unranked and password protected server, unless they wanted to do *something* involving the ranking system. Ie, stats pad like crazy with noone around to catch them.

The case is very clear cut and there's not a single argument that can rationally be made.

End of story.

[troybob]

Re: Server breaking BFRoE

I've had a conversation with them on their forums and on in person (TS - which is as close as "in person" you can get on the internet)

They were very curious about BFRoE as they did not have much knowledge of its existence.

It seems as if the problem is not with the sever admins, but with the server hosters not explaining what it means to be a ranked server.

I played on that server again, and took part in a TS conversation. They seemed like good folks willing to listen to my complaints. For this reason, I reckon (and i've never thought of this until now, that the errors lies in the communication, not in the enforcement).

Upon further conversation - they are willing to listen - as they want a good BF experience

perhaps it is not the servers, but the system. (not BFRoe - but the "trusted server" agreement to ensure that the server leasors are clear on the rules)

"all about the money",

As far as I know, EA doesn't charge to be a "trusted partner".

[N2K]

Re: Server breaking BFRoE

I have played in that server, all noobs.

[KIA_TheClash]

Re: Server breaking BFRoE

We just indeed as said before by someone Password the server so only we can join in and have a practice/scrim/clanmatch . The game will be indeed unranked .

However the first days/weeks we got the server ( day one from it went live the game ) it stayed ranked we found out later . To overcome that period we hired a extra unranked server for practice .

You can also create several profiles you can load up :

For eg : create one for clanmatch ( maps/settings )
certain maps or liek citymaps only .

These are all ranked with exception of clanmatch/practcie profiles due being passworded .

[=IMO=THJones]

Re: Server breaking BFRoE

Allow me to attempt to explain this in a way everyone can understand.

The argument "It's their server so they can do what they like" is flat out wrong.

First off, it's not their server. It's their lisenced server. It doesn't belong to them, they don't rent is, they don't lease it. They lisence it. There's a big difference between those concepts. Under a lisenced agreement, all rights remain with the actual owner (EA) and the lisencee (in this case the NATO clan) is bound by the rules as laid out by the lisence (the ROE).

The ROE clearly stipulates that you cannot kick people out of ranked servers without just cause. This means they violated the lisence and can be spanked for it (they could lose their lisence, for example).

If they wanted to have a clan practice all they had to do is to password protect the server and it would become unranked. There would be no violation in this case since the ROE only applies to ranked servers.

Moreover, there is no reason not to have practices on a unranked and password protected server, unless they wanted to do *something* involving the ranking system. Ie, stats pad like crazy with noone around to catch them.

The case is very clear cut and there's not a single argument that can rationally be made.

End of story.

they fact is a percentage of server owners do and have stat padded since day one with no repercussions from EA. At this point the ranks and awards mean nothing because of the lack of actual policing of stat padders, sure a few have been singled out but the majority have been left alone because of the vagueness and grey areas and loop holes left by EA. For example these guys could have done a couple perfectly legal thing like:
1. booted to make room for an admin/clan member ( there is no regulation stating how long before that admin or clan member shows up you can kick to make room for them.)
2. set up enough reserved slots to exclude any more than the number of clan members that would be there so no one else could even log into the server thus making it a LEGAL PRIVATE SERVER.

these are but a few things being done

[imported_ColonelPanic]

Re: Server breaking BFRoE

Do yourself and your blood pressure a favor and forget about ever trying to have the BFROE inforced.

Good advice. And it's "enforced".

[(4THIDUSA) SSG H.]

Re: Server breaking BFRoE

we dont to start a speeling bee with people

[troybob]

Re: Server breaking BFRoE

we dont to start a speeling bee with people

it's spelled "don't"

[imported_Sacramento]

Re: Server breaking BFRoE

we dont to start a speeling bee with people

May you repeat the word?

May you use it in a sentence please?

May I know the language of origin?

Can I verify the part of speech?

Ok....

Enforced....

e-n-f-a-w-r-c-e-d

enforced....

DING!!! (smacktard)