Anti-Tank

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AlphaNut

    #16
    Re: Anti-Tank

    They buffed the P90 a lot.
    It was not as good as it is now previously. They have brought it, and the other smgs on par with similar calibre weapons.
    ROF is great on the P90. With the right momentum you can take out any class in cqb with this gun.

    Comment

    • [2bit]Modmaven

      #17
      Re: Anti-Tank

      186 hours of Anti Tank here, all with the DAO. Anti Tank is definitely very valuable to take out all those pesky vehicles. Use every available cover to get up close, and let them have it!

      Comment

      • poisonsoul

        #18
        Re: Anti-Tank

        Originally posted by AF-|FireFox|
        DAO pwns. You can't however go out guns blazing in the middle of a firefight 50 yards away expecting to kill people with it though
        I've killed someone that was 50 yards away, I think it was a fluke, he probably had one health bar or something.

        Comment

        • jdrou
          Member
          • Jul 2006
          • 1860

          #19
          Re: Anti-Tank

          Originally posted by AlphaNut
          They buffed the P90 a lot.
          It was not as good as it is now previously. They have brought it, and the other smgs on par with similar calibre weapons.
          ROF is great on the P90. With the right momentum you can take out any class in cqb with this gun.
          See my other posts. It's OK but not great. True, SMGs are much better than they were originally; they are now adequate instead of useless. While almost any gun can take out someone in CQB, the real question is which will usually win. I think assault rifles, shotguns, and most LMGs will usually win over SMGs in CQB. But the thing that really kills them is that the pistols are so much better at longer ranges. If real SMGs were as bad as the ones in BF2, I'm sure SMGs would be completely unused in the military, even in specops.

          Originally posted by machstem
          4) I can't hit anything with the MP5, even close range. That thing really does suck the big one. I don't mind the Chinese or MEC default AT weapons though, I can do surprisingly well.
          The accuracy difference between the SMGs is miniscule. The major difference is the magazine capacity.

          Comment

          • Black_05_TL_6sd

            #20
            Re: Anti-Tank

            Originally posted by jdrou
            Using the P90 in single-shot is generally pointless because the pistol is more accurate (lower base deviation, lower prone modifier, lower zoomed modifier, lower movement modifier, lower per-shot modifier) and powerful (20 damage vs. 19). The only advantage the P90 has over a pistol is the full-auto RoF in close-combat (or shooting at a target more than 300 yards away; good luck). Yes, some people can do well with it but I prefer the pistol+DAO combo.
            The big difference is that you get 50 rounds vs the 15 of the pistol. So if you single shot at a fast rate, you will have more shots hit. It also has the red dot on the scope vs iron sites of the pistol. 20 vs 19, big deal one extra shot will make up for that. I know everyone is different, but it sucks to get caught at a distance with a shotgun, you are not going to win, hidding and using sigle shot at least gives a chance with the P90. You are just SOL if cought in a long range fire fight with the DAO. But to each his own.

            Comment

            • imported_Master Shake

              #21
              Re: Anti-Tank

              I have used the Anti tank allot esspecially when BF2 came out, and once I got the DAO it was much less stressfull to run into a guy at point blank range. Also I love to unload about 5-7 shells into a guy when his back is turned or hes sniping......its funny.

              Comment

              Working...