Picture this scenario:
You're running up to a train boxcar. Someone is inside. It's a sniper. He has claymores on the entrances. He's too deep inside of the boxcar for you to shoot him from the outside. You have no grenades left. His foot is sticking out. You have two options:
a) Stab/shoot their foot and kill them.
b) Skip the kill or wait until an opportunity to kill him presents itself.
What would you do? Is an apparent game bug like this considered exploiting?
It's quite evident that there's no honorable "creed" that we can all agree to, since everyone has a different view on the subject. I say it depends. If it's a competitive match, you should take the kill. If it's not, just let it go and move on.
We all know that this bug will not be fixed because it's been around ever since BF1942. Can we fault a player for taking every opportunity that presents itself to win? Even if all he has to do is take a shot?
Discuss!
You're running up to a train boxcar. Someone is inside. It's a sniper. He has claymores on the entrances. He's too deep inside of the boxcar for you to shoot him from the outside. You have no grenades left. His foot is sticking out. You have two options:
a) Stab/shoot their foot and kill them.
b) Skip the kill or wait until an opportunity to kill him presents itself.
What would you do? Is an apparent game bug like this considered exploiting?
It's quite evident that there's no honorable "creed" that we can all agree to, since everyone has a different view on the subject. I say it depends. If it's a competitive match, you should take the kill. If it's not, just let it go and move on.
We all know that this bug will not be fixed because it's been around ever since BF1942. Can we fault a player for taking every opportunity that presents itself to win? Even if all he has to do is take a shot?
Discuss!
Comment