Re: My AA rant
Seriously............this quote says it all, from a self professed, superstar pilot, and superstar AA operator.
What can you assume from this quote?
Hmmmm class, lets see....im thinking....
THAT AA SUCKS AGAINST PLANES, MAYBE? But what if we made the AA stronger again? Now all of a sudden the pilots would need to treat the AA as potential threats and need to concentrate on getting them OUT before going and laming up the ground, mowing down infantry, and bombing folks.......
and now we got this "hang gliding" term. I see it MORE AND MORE lately, where these jets go like. .... what? 4 mph for about 10 seconds, just massively rapping with the guns. lol. That screams imbalance right there. Thats like saying you can take a tank, and go against 5 apcs, without incident. Guess what? You cant. You will lose.
Anyways, who cares.....i rarely man AA unless its against a helo. Cuz i suck? or wont get big points? No............because if i man that thing against a plan, i have a 90% chance of dying from it, and a 90% chance of hitting it.
Super bad odds. Why bother? In reality there is ........."no chance".
Where is weakness when your firing heat seaking missles at a plane? You get a lock on tone. You fire 2 shots. I see nothing special in that. Yet, for some reason, 90% of the time we aint gonna hit anything. I will probally have to get lucky to stay alive, first, and have to get 3 seperate tones, with 5-6 shots at you, before i kill, or atleast hurt you a bit.
I was like super good at AT when game first started. YOu can look up my stats if you want......but if you do, realize that i was AT primarily when the game first started.
The biggest weakness i found overall with the Anti-tank class, going against any armor is.............. The shell doing anything at all. Usually, in dire times, the famous Ghost Shell fires......not sure what it does. I see it ......it looks like it hits the tank...........but then it looks like it goes through tank......and then continues on for.......who knows when.
The AT shell against the tank, is so lopsided anymore, it almost dont matter where you shoot. Im not saying the shell sucks against the tank, im saying, maybe you'll hit it.........maybe you wont. (even if its 8 feet from you )
Originally posted by metallicaguitrst
What can you assume from this quote?
Hmmmm class, lets see....im thinking....
THAT AA SUCKS AGAINST PLANES, MAYBE? But what if we made the AA stronger again? Now all of a sudden the pilots would need to treat the AA as potential threats and need to concentrate on getting them OUT before going and laming up the ground, mowing down infantry, and bombing folks.......
and now we got this "hang gliding" term. I see it MORE AND MORE lately, where these jets go like. .... what? 4 mph for about 10 seconds, just massively rapping with the guns. lol. That screams imbalance right there. Thats like saying you can take a tank, and go against 5 apcs, without incident. Guess what? You cant. You will lose.
Anyways, who cares.....i rarely man AA unless its against a helo. Cuz i suck? or wont get big points? No............because if i man that thing against a plan, i have a 90% chance of dying from it, and a 90% chance of hitting it.
Super bad odds. Why bother? In reality there is ........."no chance".
Originally posted by metallicaguitrst
I was like super good at AT when game first started. YOu can look up my stats if you want......but if you do, realize that i was AT primarily when the game first started.
The biggest weakness i found overall with the Anti-tank class, going against any armor is.............. The shell doing anything at all. Usually, in dire times, the famous Ghost Shell fires......not sure what it does. I see it ......it looks like it hits the tank...........but then it looks like it goes through tank......and then continues on for.......who knows when.
The AT shell against the tank, is so lopsided anymore, it almost dont matter where you shoot. Im not saying the shell sucks against the tank, im saying, maybe you'll hit it.........maybe you wont. (even if its 8 feet from you )
Comment