Stads-Padding???

Re: Stads-Padding???

screw the bf roe

:salute:

[JonnyMacFred102]

Re: Stads-Padding???

screw the bf roe

I second that...

And no, 16 players on 64 player servers is NOT stat padding. They may say high points but why would that make it different from the same server that didn't say high points?

Re: Stads-Padding???

Well now that is a professional opinion Ali G... if you don't agree with it that is one thing. But even if you don't StatPadding WILL get you caught and it WILL result in account being dealt with.

Re: Stads-Padding???

screw the bf roe

Re: Stads-Padding???

that would take the feel of bf away no vehicles or class chosing = no fun

Re: Stads-Padding???

Well if this so called next booster pack is all about Infantry then that BF2ROE will be out the door sooner or later..

[Talus]

Re: Stads-Padding???

weird .. *****

Re: Stads-Padding???

with ***** using such ambiguous nomenclature as "High Points" servers, I feel the onus is on the powers that be to identify it so we know exactly what it is we are avoiding...

16 people on a 64 person map makes for longer matches which generally result in high scores, but nothing inherent about the style of play is affecting the scores...just the time players are given to amass them.

Playing 10 rounds at 40 points apiece in 2 hours versus playing 2 rounds at 200 points apiece in 2 hours results in the same thing, am I right?

It is this players opinion that the restriction on "High Points" servers should be lifted or more clearly defined.


HAHAHA

*EDIT*

***** is a censored word? B.F.R.O.E.? I dont get it but that is classic.

[Talus]

Re: Stads-Padding???

Hey..no banning or flaming here.

I'm just posting an answer to a question and some useful information.

What do *I* think?

I think if you like that sort of gameplay, then do WHATEVER YOU WANT on an unraked server. No way you could call it stat padding then. Nobody is stopping you or anybody else from this sort of behaviour.

Re: Stads-Padding???

.... (here we go again :p) but @ the end you will see that the question is What do you THINK
i'm not asking about rules or anything i jsut want 2 know what people think about this rule ... do you get my point??

Having your own opinion here, if it isn't the popular one, will more than likely get you flamed or banned.

Re: Stads-Padding???

..but it doesn't matter WHAT we think.

That's the way it is.

And I answered your question directly:


Let's have this debate after the next patch comes out.

That way, we'll see if they allow "infantry_only=1" on ranked servers.

.... (here we go again :p) but @ the end you will see that the question is What do you THINK
i'm not asking about rules or anything i jsut want 2 know what people think about this rule ... do you get my point??

[Talus]

Re: Stads-Padding???

..but it doesn't matter WHAT we think.

That's the way it is.

And I answered your question directly:

Are Infantry only servers being treaded as Stads-padding???

Let's have this debate after the next patch comes out.

That way, we'll see if they allow "infantry_only=1" on ranked servers.

Re: Stads-Padding???

read the ROE

http://www.bfroe.com/forum/showthread.php?t=171

|Tnx for all the rules and stuff but.... my question was "What do you think??"
but tnx anyway :)

Re: Stads-Padding???

Me I play in servers with 50+ players on either 32 or 64 player maps. I like to kill.
20 people in a 64 player is boring.
Just running around caping flags and seeing
an enemy every couple of minutes does not sound
like much fun.
By the way isn’t 16 players in a 64 player map the
definition of long round?

Re: Stads-Padding???

If EA says its not stat padding, then it isn't. It's their world, I just live in it.