For BF2 and for really all games, which is better to have 4 512MB sticks of RAM or 2 1GB sticks of RAM? I've heard that the 512 is better but then i heard the 1GB is better.
4-512MB Vs. 2-1GB of RAM
Collapse
X
-
Re: 4-512MB Vs. 2-1GB of RAM
But not as much if you have to run it in 2T command rate.Originally posted by General_Han_Solo4x 512 MB ON ANY CPU is better, due to the matrix addresses. The way they are laid out, is much more efficienct, because theres more pathways to allocate the data. Thats it basically.Comment
-
Re: 4-512MB Vs. 2-1GB of RAM
Maybe in theory, but in the real world 2 x 1Gb is slightly better. You don't have the possibility of only being able to run your memory at 333mhz or 2T.Originally posted by General_Han_Solo4x 512 MB ON ANY CPU is better, due to the matrix addresses. The way they are laid out, is much more efficienct, because theres more pathways to allocate the data. Thats it basically.
Go with 2 x 1Gb for sure.Comment
-
Re: 4-512MB Vs. 2-1GB of RAM
Yeah i guess, but just for the sake of it, like being a fanboy :pOriginally posted by lil_jimmy_nortonBut not as much if you have to run it in 2T command rate.
EDIT: Theres only a 10% performance increase, ONLY in certain applications. Just luck, on which one works the best.Comment
-
Re: 4-512MB Vs. 2-1GB of RAM
A pair of 1 gigers is best for several reasons. Most importantly, your mobo's memory controller will have less work to do with two DIMMS instead of keeping up with four. Also, it takes less power from your PSU.
About 1T and 2T settings. I thought Intel mobos default to 2T regardless. If so, if won't matter for an intel user. AMD suffers from a 1T to a 2T drop.Comment
-
Re: 4-512MB Vs. 2-1GB of RAM
Originally posted by Shamus
About 1T and 2T settings. I thought Intel mobos default to 2T regardless. If so, if won't matter for an intel user. AMD suffers from a 1T to a 2T drop.
That's possible, I have little experiance with the newer intel sysems. My last intel used RDRAM
.
Comment
-
Re: 4-512MB Vs. 2-1GB of RAM
you can manually set the rates with 4 sticks to 1t etc...
as for the only benefits I see of 2x1GB, would be you can addmore sticks in the future, but the only way to keep dual channel would be to have 4GB. and the only way to have 4gb is windows x64.Comment
-
Re: 4-512MB Vs. 2-1GB of RAM
AMD suffers? Hardly.
Maybe you computer 'whizzes' should head over to www.dfi-street.com
The supposed increases in performance will be unnoticed at best.
You only worry about 1T and 2T w/ overclocking. (Even though it is necessary to use the appropriate setting w/ each setup)
If you go 4 sticks(4x512MB), you'll be fine dude. If you choose 2 sticks (2x1GB) you'll be fine there also.Comment
-
Re: 4-512MB Vs. 2-1GB of RAM
Actually, thats a good point. I guess in the end, it all comes down to a draw. Why not just put 2x 1GB, then save up for another 2x 1GB for the other 2 slots :)Originally posted by ShamusA pair of 1 gigers is best for several reasons. Most importantly, your mobo's memory controller will have less work to do with two DIMMS instead of keeping up with four. Also, it takes less power from your PSU.
About 1T and 2T settings. I thought Intel mobos default to 2T regardless. If so, if won't matter for an intel user. AMD suffers from a 1T to a 2T drop.Comment
Comment