Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • =98=
    Member
    • Oct 2006
    • 10299

    #16
    Re: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650

    32nm is a year or two off. They are still suffering from leakage at this moment in time.

    Comment

    • Busby, Paul (Bicci)

      #17
      Re: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650

      So they are not going to meet there usual 'tock' goal point?

      Comment

      • signa
        CS-Nation / TGN Staff
        • Dec 2004
        • 4191

        #18
        Re: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650

        Originally posted by [25]B|Olt.B1scu1T[FM]
        i wudnt even save for i7 i would wait for the 'tock' revision to 32nm which should include the better bang for buck i5 CPU.
        thats true, but what I meant was its probably not worth it to do a cpu upgrade to bump up the performance only slightly, especially when the upgrade cpu has already been replaced with a new line.
        "Crunch's First Officer"
        twitter: @signaprime

        Comment

        Working...