Nah its like this
4850 > GTX260 > 4870 512 = GTX 216 > 4870 1GB > GTX 280 > 4870X2
GTX 260 vs 4850 (unless your running 16xaa the 4850 lags behind by about 20%-30%)
[media]http://www.techspot.com/articles-info/109/bench/Crysis_02.png[/media]
[media]http://www.techspot.com/articles-info/109/bench/DMC4_02.png[/media]
[media]http://www.techspot.com/articles-info/109/bench/UT3_01.png[/media]
core 216 vs 4870
[media]http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/gtx260core216_091508220645/17382.png[/media]
[media]http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/gtx260core216_091508220645/17383.png[/media]
[media]http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/gtx260core216_091508220645/17387.png[/media]
[media]http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/gtx260core216_091508220645/17388.png[/media]
A 4850x2 will be better than a 4870. ATI have done a good job of getting internal Crossfire to work and this shows through the phenomenal performance of the 4870x2.



Leave a comment: