32-Bit vs 64-Bit

[=98=]

Re: 32-Bit vs 64-Bit

why are you so against XPx64? I've been using it on this build for over a year with no issues, no hard to find drivers, no programs that wont run on it. I had one x-fi issue that was corrected when they released an updated driver.

I think you are lucky sir. A lot of people have issues with this OS.

[signa]

Re: 32-Bit vs 64-Bit

Vista 64bit > Vista 32bit > XP 32bit > MS-DOS > Free-BSD > Windows 3.1 > XP 64bit

why are you so against XPx64? I've been using it on this build for over a year with no issues, no hard to find drivers, no programs that wont run on it. I had one x-fi issue that was corrected when they released an updated driver.

Re: 32-Bit vs 64-Bit

Vista 64bit > Vista 32bit > XP 32bit > MS-DOS > Free-BSD > Windows 3.1 > XP 64bit

So true.

[Skaggy]

Re: 32-Bit vs 64-Bit

64 bit has the capacity to have more RAM installed; Vista uses more resources than XP. Just to clarify.

It actually uses more to run applications, too.

[=)BiT(= Evant3k]

Re: 32-Bit vs 64-Bit

Why Vista on that machine? You wont be able to run games on DX10 anyhow, since the CPU and VGA is too weak. IMO the only reason to get Vista is DX10 other then that it uses way more resources then XP, and only slows your machine down. And if you want a flashy desktop just mod XP a little bit you will have the same thing.

[Kradath]

Re: 32-Bit vs 64-Bit

Vista works fine for me, not the fastest solution but it works well all in all with my 3400+.

[[USAC]S|Cpl.TinFoil]

Re: 32-Bit vs 64-Bit

By god, do not install Vista on a +3xxx series. I tried that with an old Emachines computer and it slowed to a crawl when booting up and doing system-intensive tasks. Your RAM amount is fine, though.

64 bit uses more ram, Vista uses more resources.

64 bit has the capacity to have more RAM installed; Vista uses more resources than XP. Just to clarify.

[=98=]

Re: 32-Bit vs 64-Bit

Vista uses superfetch to fill unused RAM. It enables programs to open faster by having key aspects of them already open. So, it uses the RAM to good effect and it can be turned off if you're stingey.

[Natt]

Re: 32-Bit vs 64-Bit

64 bit uses more ram, Vista uses more resources.

[=98=]

Re: 32-Bit vs 64-Bit

Your CPU would be fairly slow on Vista i think.

[Kradath]

Re: 32-Bit vs 64-Bit

If I was you I would wait for the new EFI boards, the bios follower and install Vista 64 when you got one.

[=98=]

Re: 32-Bit vs 64-Bit

Vista 64bit > Vista 32bit > XP 32bit > MS-DOS > Free-BSD > Windows 3.1 > XP 64bit

[.Gunfire]

What would be better with my current specs and also what is the difference?

The reason I ask is because I just scored a free copy of 64-Bit XP and Vista...